Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Notre Dame safety Zeke Motta visited Panthers, Falcons


CamNewton316

Recommended Posts

Safeties tend not to be the fastest players on defense because of the buffer they have with the offense. They instead rely on their intelligence, awareness, and agility to get themselves in the right position. Motta may not have speed, but he sounds like a smart player. It's not like we're considering him for 14...possibly good depth at a position of need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Safeties tend not to be the fastest players on defense because of the buffer they have with the offense. They instead rely on their intelligence, awareness, and agility to get themselves in the right position. Motta may not have speed, but he sounds like a smart player. It's not like we're considering him for 14...possibly good depth at a position of need.

Meet Ed Reed.

The Roy Williams safety doesn't work in this league any more. Your Safeties have to have speed to play against all these spread formation passing attacks. Plus with all the fast TE's becoming major weapons. It's not good to have a slow safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 40 yard dash time only measures a player's track speed. While it's a load of crap to begin with, it's more of a relevance for CBs since they will be going full speed with WRs on a 9-route. Safeties need to have everything in front of them and the awareness to notice an offense's tendencies...which requires quickness and intelligence. If they are going at their top speed for a good portion of the field, chances are they fugged up their coverage and are having to make up for their mistake.

Sure, top speed is a nice perk for a safety, but not entirely a requirement if they have the other tools necessary for the job. And especially not for a 6th round prospect who would be good depth someday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...