Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PTI (Wilbon, Kornheiser) Both Love the Change to Hornets


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Bear with me, this is a recap...

 

Wilbon said the change shows the franchise is trying to connect to the "good times" in which we sold out every game for 6 consecutive seasons and that we were "Oklahoma City before Oklahoma City."

 

Kornheiser said he was iffy about name changes in general, as in his adopted home of D.C. made the switch from Bullets to Wizards.  He said all of the fans hate the name and think it's generic and are constantly asking their owner, Ted Leonsis, to change the name back to the Bullets. 

 

Wilbon then countered that Kornheiser would be in favor of our switch to the Hornets then, because the Hornets were the original name and harkened to more successful, happier times.  Kornheiser said absolutely and he thinks it's a great move to the Hornets for us.  Both Wilbon and Kornheiser then ended the segment concurring that it's the best move for us and that we're trying to reconnect with the community in a way that the Bobcats couldn't.

 

Kornheiser also said being named the Bobcats was like Jed York buying the Niners and changing their name to the "Jedcats."

 

Wilbon concluded by saying it's a great move and we should have always been the Hornets.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just seeing the impact this decision has made on my Facebook/Twitter feeds from people I didn't think were even fans, it's already a great decision.  Yeah it sucks that these same people (myself included) weren't huge Bobcats supporters, but if even 1/5th of the people posting about the name change stick around to be Hornets fans, it's worth it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...