Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gay player...problem fans


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

Gays is not a civil issue... To have that in the same respect as the civil rights is ludacris... Homosexuality is a choice... There is no gay gene...its a perversion... Theres strength in numbers... Its being forced on society...

 

When I see someone say being gay is a choice, what I hear is "I have gay feelings but choose to suppress them." You're admitting you choose to be straight, which implies you could have as easily chosen to be gay. It's an interesting insight into the minds of some people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone say BROCCOLI!

 

 

 

wow holy 24 page thread in no time, Batmang!

 

 

Not so sure locker rooms would be cool about it either btw, many would, but some wouldnt and I think it would cause a rift in the team. Chemistry is so important to some teams that I doubt they would gamble on bringing a gay guy in JUST because of that alone. I think any coach asked about the issue is obligated to say his team wouldnt have a problem with it or he would be facing a poo storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone say BROCCOLI!

 

 

 

wow holy 24 page thread in no time, Batmang!

 

 

Not so sure locker rooms would be cool about it either btw, many would, but some wouldnt and I think it would cause a rift in the team. Chemistry is so important to some teams that I doubt they would gamble on bringing a gay guy in JUST because of that alone. I think any coach asked about the issue is obligated to say his team wouldnt have a problem with it or he would be facing a poo storm.

 

 

it might be a problem till a couple of gay players knocked the poo out of their teammates for talking trash... then it would be over and everything would be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HelloWorld

I don't even have time on my phone to go over how far off most of your statement is, but I'll leave you with this question.

You do realize gays have been murdered, lynched and dragged behind cars for being gay right??

Honest question to you. Do you think gays will ever be accepted by the mass?

My contention is no. But I'm sure if homosexuals had a natural identifying mark on their body, you know, like a black dot on their forehead since birth, people would have no choice but to. Heck, if green aliens from outer space come to earth and demand their equal rights, they'd get. My point is, people will always view homosexuality as a choice. Don't compare it to being black.

 

Me, personally, I don't care. In fact, gay people are the nicest people you'll ever meet. Unfortunately the mass will never see it that way. It's gonna take a lot of generations of parents to teach their kids better before we'll see full acceptance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a choice home boy... Just like doing drugs...addicts need it after awhile still a choice...

When I see someone say being gay is a choice, what I hear is "I have gay feelings but choose to suppress them." You're admitting you choose to be straight, which implies you could have as easily chosen to be gay. It's an interesting insight into the minds of some people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, Beans, NFL guys have made living off of aggression and not giving in. I cant say I agree with you on this one.

 

 

the gay ones have too.   We're talking about the same guys.  Just as tough, just as hard, just as strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HelloWorld

i'm really lost with the introduction of broccoli into this whole thing.

 

 

 

is it the root of hate?

 

 

 

 

 

we may never know...

 

lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea evolving morally is a strong stance.  How can one evolve morally? Better question, why would someone want to evolve morally?

 

Who benefits from mystical evolution?  Also, morals don't evolve they get bent to the point where they aren't thought about anymore then they become a myth.  This great country was built on morals, no in under 50 years those morals have been castaway like you would a disposable razor.

After reading through these 20+ pages, I have to say it truly saddens me that we have not evolved morally and ethically past this being an issue.  Bigotry, hatred, deep seeded religious based insecurities and misinformation are still strong in the Carolinas.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was soooo spot on about everything from the board environment to the QB guru extremist terrible takes. I wish more people on this board would elevate their energy and knowledge so we could have a fun board again. Cheers to better Panther Fan Culture.
    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
×
×
  • Create New...