Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NHL Draft:1st Round (5th Overall): Carolina Selects Elias Lindholm


Recommended Posts

Lindholm, a native of Gavle, Sweden, is the third-ranked European skater by the National Hockey League’s Central Scouting Service. Similar to Barkov, Lindholm, 18, attracted attention with a stellar season in a professional league as a teenager.

 

Developed in the Brynas system, Lindholm made his debut in the Swedish Hockey League as a 17-year-old, skating in 12 regular-season games and two playoff matches for the Brynas men’s team. In the same season on Brynas’ under-20 squad, Lindholm notched 49 points (14g, 35a) in 36 games.

 

In 2012-13, Lindholm made the full-time jump to the Swedish Hockey League. In 48 games with Brynas, he led all SHL juniors with 30 points (11g, 19a) and was only one of two Brynas skaters who finished the season with a plus rating. Lindholm ranked fourth among SHL junior players, second among SHL junior forwards and sixth among Brynas forwards in average ice time with 16:17. In four playoff games, Lindholm’s average ice time jumped to 18:36, ranking fifth on Brynas. He finished the season as an SHL rookie of the year finalist.

 

Lindholm is a two-time silver medalist in international play. As an alternate captain for the Swedish national team in the 2012 World Under-18 Championship, Lindholm potted three points (2g, 1a) in four games. He recorded four points (2g, 2a) in six games skating with Team Sweden at the 2013 World Junior Championship in Ufa, Russia.

 

 

Some scouts have compared Lindholm to fellow Swede Peter Forsberg. MacDonald cautions against such lofty association, even if he projects as a future top-six forward.

 

Lindholm hails from a hockey background. His father, Mikael, was drafted by the Los Angeles Kings in the 12th round (237th overall) of the 1987 NHL Entry Draft. He logged 18 games in the NHL in the 1989-90 season, posting four points (2g, 2a). Aside from nearly 30 games in the AHL and a season in the now-defunct International Hockey League (IHL), the balance of Mikael’s 14-year hockey career was largely spent in the then-Swedish Elite League.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Smith ‏@MSmithCanes

When asked about the NHL next season, Lindholm smiled and said, "We'll see."

 

Michael Smith ‏@MSmithCanes

Lindholm just finished up his first NHL media scrum. Speaks excellent English.

 

Chip Alexander ‏@ice_chip

Lindholm says he has spoken to fellow Swedes Victor Rask and Karlsson about Canes.

 

Michael Smith ‏@MSmithCanes

Lindholm has one year remaining on his contract with Brynas. Has not yet talked to them about leaving.

 

Chip Alexander ‏@ice_chip

Lindholm's goal is to play in NHL next season but did note he has a year left on his contract in Swedish elite league.

 

Chip Alexander ‏@ice_chip

Lindholm says he was interviewed by Canes at combine and in NY. Said he expected to go 5-9 in draft.

 

Michael Smith ‏@MSmithCanes

Lindholm said he's talked to Rask and Karlsson about Carolina. Also said he's played enough video games to be familiar with team.

 

Michael Smith ‏@MSmithCanes

Lindholm said he was "maybe all skill" as a kid. Then he watched Peter Forsberg and worked to improve his two-way game.

 

Michael Smith ‏@MSmithCanes

Lindholm is a self-described solid two-way player. MacDonald said he has an incredibly strong work ethic. Muller likes those guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not a solid two way player. He's freaking horrible in the defensive zone. It's really the only minus to his game asides from his shot. (he's just got an average shot, nothing exceptional about it.) 

 

 

Someone on twitter said he could develop into a Ruutu type of player, my response to that is with the 5th pick he better be quite a bit better then Ruutu. 

 

 

He's also another Centre that the team needs to move to the wing, unless they make a trade and move J. Staal to the top line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not a solid two way player. He's freaking horrible in the defensive zone. It's really the only minus to his game asides from his shot. (he's just got an average shot, nothing exceptional about it.) 

 

Actually, I just watched his video at the world juniors, and that was one of his strengths.

 

Watch the second video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd try him all over the second line.  He's one of the best playmakers in the draft  Could work well with Jordan and Skinner.

 

I'd actually ease him in and play him on the third line...

 

No since and telling him that his primary goal is to not let Skinner get hurt...

 

Tlusty - E. Staal - Semin

Skinner - J. Staal - Ruutu

? - Lindholm - ?

? - ? - ?

 

Guys on the roster

Drayson Bowman

Kevin Westgarth

Patrick Dwyer

 

 

Could Make The Jump

Phillip Di Giuseppe

Victor Rask

Zac Dalpe

Brock McGinn

Jerome Samson

Brett Sutter

Tim Wallace

Riley Nash

Jeremy Welsh

Justin Shugg

Luke Pither

Andreas Nodl

Chris Terry

Luke Pither

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd try him all over the second line.  He's one of the best playmakers in the draft  Could work well with Jordan and Skinner.

He'd never touch the puck, lmao.

 

I'd like to see Skinner traded and put Lindholm on the second line with Tlusty and Ruutu.  Move J. Staal to the first line. 

 

E. Staal/J. Staal/ Semin

Tlusty/ Lindholm/ Ruutu

 

 

 

At least this way your giving the kid a chance to succeed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'd never touch the puck, lmao.

 

I'd like to see Skinner traded and put Lindholm on the second line with Tlusty and Ruutu.  Move J. Staal to the first line. 

 

E. Staal/J. Staal/ Semin

Tlusty/ Lindholm/ Ruutu

 

 

 

At least this way your giving the kid a chance to succeed. 

 

No way they mess with that first line.

 

That first line was one of the best in all of hockey last year.

 

Tlusty scored 23 goals last year because of Staal and Semin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way they mess with that first line.

 

That first line was one of the best in all of hockey last year.

 

Tlusty scored 23 goals last year because of Staal and Semin.

 

 

It's being talked about. Putting Lindholm on the second line with Skinner and Tlusty and moving Staal up to the first. 

 

I'd rather that line not have Skinner on it, which is why I added the trade in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's being talked about. Putting Lindholm on the second line with Skinner and Tlusty and moving Staal up to the first. 

 

I'd rather that line not have Skinner on it, which is why I added the trade in. 

 

No it's not either, they just drafted the kid lol.

 

There is no way they would bump Tlusty down after the year he had last year.

 

And I'v heard you want to trade Skinner about 20 times now, bottom line is he doesn't get traded unless it's for Marc Staal... so you can relax...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lol. Any reason to throw digs at this guy. I didn't say he was built to do it. I said he was successful every time he's tried. That means he can do it. That's the opposite of fantasy. That's reality.  Steve Smith wasn't built to be a jump ball WR either. But he did it at a high clip. For the record, I'm not saying BY is the level of QB as Smitty was as a WR. Just an example of size not being the only component. 
    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.  That too is truth.  Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL, but drafting a first-round OT now is either wasting the money we just paid for a free agent OR it is like paying top dollar for a new car and keeping it in your garage for a season.  A first rounder should give us 4-5 years of cap relief by playing from day 1. I shall elaborate here: Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
×
×
  • Create New...