Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Good Game Seahawks

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

RelaxImaPro Enthusiast

RelaxImaPro

Posted
Posted

Wilson was absolutely great under pressure.  But that one catch down the sidelines was complete fuging luck... he got pushed way back out of the pocket running for his life and was just trying to sling that thing out of bounds... surprise sur-fuging-prise someone (Baldwin I think) somehow miraculously catches it.

 

It was an awesome play on the Hawks part, but no way in hell was even thinking about making a pass there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
K-Hawk Newbie

K-Hawk

Posted
Posted

Especially that K Hawk dick bag.

 

Smart, analytical people make you feel small, do they?

(I don't have to be nice anymore; doesn't matter if I get banned.)

 

Really, poop-talking ain't my thing, but I have a really serious allergy to stupidity. If you're going to talk poop, either make it smart or make it funny. Don't make it stupid. #norespectforthat

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ruff Newbie

Ruff

Posted
Posted

Smart, analytical people make you feel small, do they?

(I don't have to be nice anymore; doesn't matter if I get banned.)

Really, poop-talking ain't my thing, but I have a really serious allergy to stupidity. If you're going to talk poop, either make it smart or make it funny. Don't make it stupid. #norespectforthat

TvgyTNi.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
K-Hawk Newbie

K-Hawk

Posted
Posted

Wilson was absolutely great under pressure.  But that one catch down the sidelines was complete fuging luck... he got pushed way back out of the pocket running for his life and was just trying to sling that thing out of bounds... surprise sur-fuging-prise someone (Baldwin I think) somehow miraculously catches it.

 

It was an awesome play on the Hawks part, but no way in hell was even thinking about making a pass there.

 

Having watched Wilson this last year, I agree with the analysts that he did thebest he could to get it into a window  Baldwin could get to. One of his best attributes as a passer is his abilityto put it where the only his guys can catch it. And the Seahawks receivers have been making those kinds of catches since early last year. They are MUCH better than people think.

Could have been pure luck, but probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Montsta Rising Star

Montsta

Posted
Posted

Smart, analytical people make you feel small, do they?

(I don't have to be nice anymore; doesn't matter if I get banned.)

Really, poop-talking ain't my thing, but I have a really serious allergy to stupidity. If you're going to talk poop, either make it smart or make it funny. Don't make it stupid. #norespectforthat

This isn't twitter you basic bitch. No need for hashtags. #howsthatforsmart

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest CarolinaBlacknBlueblood

Guest CarolinaBlacknBlueblood

Posted
Posted

What are you guys talking aboutm ? This loss isnt on tje coaches, its all on the players making stupid mistakes. Dwill better hav a ball in his hand the rest of the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest CarolinaBlacknBlueblood

Guest CarolinaBlacknBlueblood

Posted
Posted

Respect to those of you giving props where due.

Wilson is the exact opposite of a game manager. I think those of you who appreciate football now get that.

Don't give up on Newton.

Cheers, y'all.

Dont give up on Newton? You wish you had newton. We gave that game to you guys with stupid mistakes. Dont sit there a beat your chest, good luck getting through the rest on the nfl with tjat garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

If I was not a fan of either team, I would have thought damn what a good ole fashioned defensive struggle. It really was a good game but unfortunately as a panther fan we came out on the wrong side of it.

Seattles fuging good and we hung with them until the end when we ran out of gas from chasing that escape artist of a QB they have. I have to admit he's better than I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...