Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Only 2 options with Rivera


CanadianCat

Recommended Posts

The writing on the wall says that Rivera will not be back next year unless a miracle happens and looking at our 2nd half opponents looks like we might go 0-6 ending the year with a bad taste in our mouth. That being said I have been trying to figure out in my mind what DG’s best choice with Rivera would be. I have narrowed it down to 2 options.

 

1.       Assuming we lose to the Giants we should fire Rivera after the game. This allows an interim coach 2 weeks to make his plan.

a.       The pro to this that it puts the entire team on notice and that ‘might’ create a spark to get us a few extra wins.

b.      The con to this is that we are starting new and chances are the interim coach is not ‘DG’s guys’ so its kind of a waste of time.

2.       Keep Rivera until the end of the year because chances are that DG’s coaching staff he wants is not currently available so plugging in new guys really doesn’t improve our situation at all.

a.       The pro to this is that it gives our team a chance to correct its mistakes and with a few lucky bounces we have a good team.

b.      The con to this is that Rivera makes coaching flubs that makes all want his head.

 

End of the day I think we either HAVE to make the move after a loss to the Giants – or don’t make one at all. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JR and DG know what they are getting with Rivera, if they wanted him gone, he would have not been retained for this season.  This is obviously a throw away year so DG can get the finances straighten out and be able to assemble a championship team for 2014 and the players are playing like it.  Why do you think everyone was getting 1 year contracts?  The thought that DG was going to be able to use what carolina already had to win a superbowl was an illusion generated by us fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JR and DG know what they are getting with Rivera, if they wanted him gone, he would have not been retained for this season.  This is obviously a throw away year so DG can get the finances straighten out and be able to assemble a championship team for 2014 and the players are playing like it.  Why do you think everyone was getting 1 year contracts?  The thought that DG was going to be able to use what carolina already had to win a superbowl was an illusion generated by us fans. 

 

1 year contracts were a league wide phenomenon. I'm not saying a lot of things aren't going to change after this year or that even Gettleman set this up just in case. But these 1 year deals were happening everywhere around the league and a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...