Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JR is starting to look very smart when he decided to keep Rivera just one more year.


CharlottePanther

Recommended Posts

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto.

 

What do I win?

 

pie.

 

you have also hit on the double or nothing WWII trivia challenge! if you choose to accept the next question and get it right, you can keep your pie for the answer AND get a random pie on another unrelated post... but if you accept it and get it wrong, you get no pie, and you lose your pie for the last correct answer.

 

do you accept?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the F6F outperforms both the F4F and the F2M though... the F2M and F6F have comparable durability (whereas the F4F is a freaking block of solid metal) but F6F can out-climb, out-turn, and outdive just about everything but a P-41. i'd take the F6F ten times out of ten

Understandable, I just like the fact that the performance is close but the plane is smaller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yamamoto also the name the space battleship of the clasic anime StarBlazers!

.....Named after Admrial Yamamoto's Battleship which was the flagship of the Japanese Navy.

Actually she's the Yamoto. (I have an obsession with that show. Straight geekdom.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pie.

 

you have also hit on the double or nothing WWII trivia challenge! if you choose to accept the next question and get it right, you can keep your pie for the answer AND get a random pie on another unrelated post... but if you accept it and get it wrong, you get no pie, and you lose your pie for the last correct answer.

 

do you accept?

 

Of course. Bring it on bubba.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course. Bring it on bubba.

 

the following naval battle took place during the latter stages of the war in the pacific theater of operations: during the first night of engagements several IJN heavy cruisers were downed by U.S. submarines, including the lead admiral's flagship. three days of intense fighting included a midnight gun battle between U.S. and IJN battleship lines (the closest thing to Plan Orange seen in WWII), extensive carrier-based strikes on IJN fleets that decimated the remainder of their carrier fleet, sunk the Musashi (sister ship of the Yamato, largest battleship in the world) and culminated in a group of exposed U.S. light carriers and destroyers holding off a massive fleet of IJN battleships and heavy cruisers at close range and inexplicably causing the Japanese admiral to turn back on the verge of crushing the U.S. defense periphery that would've allowed them unfettered access to helpless U.S. landing forces gathered off the coast.

 

without looking it up, which battle was this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the following naval battle took place during the latter stages of the war in the pacific theater of operations: during the first night of engagements several IJN heavy cruisers were downed by U.S. submarines, including the lead admiral's flagship. three days of intense fighting included a midnight gun battle between U.S. and IJN battleship lines (the closest thing to Plan Orange seen in WWII), extensive carrier-based strikes on IJN fleets that decimated the remainder of their carrier fleet, sunk the Musashi (sister ship of the Yamato, largest battleship in the world) and culminated in a group of exposed U.S. light carriers and destroyers holding off a massive fleet of IJN battleships and heavy cruisers at close range and inexplicably causing the Japanese admiral to turn back on the verge of crushing the U.S. defense periphery that would've allowed them unfettered access to helpless U.S. landing forces gathered off the coast.

 

without looking it up, which battle was this?

 

Leyte Gulf.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And of course I looked it up. I'm not one of those grizzled old guys you see on the History Channel, smoking a pipe and recounting war stories, I just know how to use the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leyte Gulf.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And of course I looked it up. I'm not one of those grizzled old guys you see on the History Channel, smoking a pipe and recounting war stories, I just know how to use the internet.

 

pie for quick research skillz, i tried to make it as nebulous as possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

welp guess we're back to obscure WWII trivia

Q: What famous Japanese admiral and Pearl Harbor mastermind was intercepted by a squadron of P-38 fighters and shot down over Bougainville in the Solomon Islands in 1943 during a morale-boosting trip after following U.S. intelligence's capture of his itinerary?

Ben Affleck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is simple if you focus only on OT.  But there is the cap, talent levels that differ from year to year, and team needs that fluctuate, as you know.  While I would be happy with an OT and understand it, I am not sold on OT as the answer. I agree that the game is won or lost in the trenches, but I do not think over-drafting with the first round pick is the only way of addressing it--especially if it may be a year before you know what you have or reap the rewards.  We both agree that you have to stay ahead of it.  Just because you take a T in round 1 does not mean that you have met the need. Teams need qbs too, but drafting them too early in round one is usually disastrous A few weeks ago, I was high on Freeling.  I still am (cautiously), but there are reasons to approach some of these tackles with a "Buyer Beware" approach.  Again, I am not against drafting an OT in round 1, but not if that OT has a late first or second-round grade.  That is not good value.  On top of that, put him in the garage for a year?  Take Freeling, for example.  Some project him to Cleveland at 6.  Really?  He is a fringe first rounder, IMO.  IF you want to give away draft capital to get a non-starter, that is how GMs get fired. First, we can address Freeling’s seemingly massive improvement in pass protection. He did earn an outstanding 86.1 PFF pass-blocking grade in 2025, which ranked seventh among qualified FBS tackles. That was an improvement over his 65.3 mark in 2024. Georgia’s passing game was heavily built on play action and screens, which allowed Freeling to partake in just 95 true pass sets all season. That ranked just barely among the top 200 tackles in the country.   Freeling earned a solid 75.4 PFF pass-blocking grade on those true pass set reps, but that pales in comparison to top tackles in the class, such as Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano. Mauigoa earned his 85.8 true PFF pass-blocking grade, second best in the nation, across 212 such reps, more than twice as many as Freeling.   What about Freeling's run blocking?  61.3--which is slightly above all tackles in the country.  So if you draft Freeling in round 1, you are getting a guy whose numbers were padded by play action and screens--but in pure passing sets and in run blocking, he was average when compared to every tackle in the country. Elite?  Buyer beware. Lomu?  Athletic, Can struggle in the run game and against power rushers.  Late first rounder-early second, imo.  Arms less than 34", which could scare some teams. Proctor?  Can play high and the weight could be a problem he fights.  Personally, I see him as the best option for an immediate starter but his ceiling is lower.   I realize all players have areas of concern, but I think you will see some of these OTs drop on draft day, with good reason.   Fano?  32 inch arms may kick him inside to G. You will respond that all OTs have question marks, and they do--but not researching the situation is not the answer.  Freeling is a stud athlete, and despite the stats, I like him, but not as depth at 19.  Proctor?  I get it if you needed your starter now, and speed rushers give him fits.  To adjust, his angle to block a 9 tech is nearly 90 degrees when it needs to be closer to 45 degrees.  That decreases the pocket, and a short QB can't have that.     
    • Stupid to say golden maye and Lloyd weren't coming just because you said but we're North Carolina? To be fair I don't think anyone would jump ship just to come to Duke either. 
×
×
  • Create New...