Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Been awhile since I seen an opposing fanbase giving us absolutely 0% chance of winning.


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

I think you need to take a reading comprehension course.  A post in response to mine was regarding a game 6 weeks ago, so I posted a relevant picture that was close to the same time frame as that.  No poo it was over a month ago, my point exactly.

 

Nervous of what? Your terribly overpaid runningback duo in which neither has rushed for over 1000 yards in the last 4 years? LOL... Your deep threat that was cut from our team because he is a terrible receiver? Your midget #1 wide receiver that runs his mouth all game long while consistently dropping passes? Your best linebacker who couldn't even keep up with Gonzalez who is 50 years old and slower than nose tackle? 

 

This feels like the SF-JAX game from London two weeks ago.  Another terrible expansion team that hasn't been relevant in at least 8 years.

 

 

Where are you old friend?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agreed.

i think our defense has been a bit more productive, but both are playing at a high level. it's definitely a push there.

i like our run game better just because it's deeper. it's going to be harder to wear out our runners than the 9ers.

i like our passing game better, mainly because we are spreading the ball around better and more efficiently and cam is a better passer.

OL is where they have an advantage...tho it isn't as big of one as it would have been last year. i do like our DL against their OL, tho. i think it's a push overall.

the biggest advantage they have is homefield and the fact that success isn't as new to them as it is to us. nerves might cause us to make a couple mistakes early. beyond that, there's really not much that the 49ers can hang their hats on.

Rayzor called his shot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

This officially cements my opinion that 49ner fans are the worst in the NFL. Even after whupping their ass on their home field they still give us 0% chance to win on our home field. And just like I said last time, I'm not saying we're going to win, but fug if I'm giving the Panthers anything less than 50-50 chances. 49ner fans are idiots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...