Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DRAFT SPECULATION/NEWS THREAD


MichaelNewtonII

Recommended Posts

I didn't say instantly or his rookie year. I think he's capable tho. May not happen but he has the shot and ability to do so. The rebound stat might be too high. Call me crazy for hoping for the best.

I'll give you that if he ever puts up those numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't have to agree with all the moves your favorite team makes to be a fan.

But why be a fan if all I'm gonna do is criticize and hate the moves they make. We could e a lot worse off. We could've traded for Brandon Jennings lol. So if they think they can make McDermott work then I will be his biggest supporter along with MKG and the rest of our prospects

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because I can see Parker coming into the league and avg. 17 -20 points a game. I don't see that for McDermott.

I can see a lot of similarities in Parker's game and Melo's game. I don't see the comparison to McDermott. Either you're talking a stretch 4 like Dirk ( but McDermott not tall enough) or a spot up wing shooter like Korver, Wally or Battie (but all of them were wing players not post players in college).

Some here see a hard transition for him and a spot where we already have young talent (Mkg, Taylor or Cody) trying to develop and don't see the need in adding another player in the mix.

This a million times over.

His game doesn't seamlessly translate to the NBA.  He is a tweener.  He played primarily as a 4 in college operating from the mid-post and out.  HE is not athletic enough to play the 3 in the pros, and he's not big/strong enough to be a 4 either.  Additionally, as you pointed out, we already have several draft picks that have shown promise and deserve the chance to develop at both of those positions.

 

We need scoring and athleticism, specifically at shooting guard.  It's why this pick would make absolutely no sense at all.  Not only are you throwing those young prospects currently on the roster under the bus for a questionable pick at positions that aren't needed, but there is no guarantee that he can even do what he did in college on the pro level.  It's just stupid anyway you look at it.

 

We don't need another guy that stands around waiting for shots, we need a guy that can make those shots when needed AND create his own when all else fails - AGAIN, at shooting guard...  NOT at the two positions we addressed most in the last two drafts.

Maybe we plan on trading MKG and they want to trade defense for offense there?  Still, I don't think he will be anymore than a spot up shooting role player, and there are players at 9 that could be much more than that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why be a fan if all I'm gonna do is criticize and hate the moves they make. We could e a lot worse off. We could've traded for Brandon Jennings lol. So if they think they can make McDermott work then I will be his biggest supporter along with MKG and the rest of our prospects

So wait are you a Panthers fan??

Did you agree with everything that Marty Hurney did?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This a million times over.

His game doesn't seamlessly translate to the NBA. He is a tweener. He played primarily as a 4 in college operating from the mid-post and out. HE is not athletic enough to play the 3 in the pros, and he's not big/strong enough to be a 4 either. Additionally, as you pointed out, we already have several draft picks that have shown promise and deserve the chance to develop at both of those positions.

We need scoring and athleticism, specifically at shooting guard. It's why this pick would make absolutely no sense at all. Not only are you throwing those young prospects currently on the roster under the bus for a questionable pick at positions that aren't needed, but there is no guarantee that he can even do what he did in college on the pro level. It's just stupid anyway you look at it.

We don't need another guy that stands around waiting for shots, we need a guy that can make those shots when needed AND create his own when all else fails - AGAIN, at shooting guard... NOT at the two positions we addressed most in the last two drafts.

Maybe we plan on trading MKG and they want to trade defense for offense there? Still, I don't think he will be anymore than a spot up shooting role player, and there are players at 9 that could be much more than that.

That's my biggest problem you trade the major reason you had a top 6 defense for uncertain offense. Why?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely forgot about him lol. Maybe they are worried about his Achilles.

He's already practicing and jumping out the gym I heard. That's why picking McDermott would be a complete buzz kill.

Don't forget that CDR is still a option as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm with WOW!! on saying we have a log jam at the 3. We need a starter quality 2 guard and an upgrade to the PF position. I really don't want to see us draft someone at a position where we have a ton of young talent. If MKG gets his confidence going, and develops a reasonable jumper, he is playing big minutes right alongside Al. I don't want to draft a player that won't contribute more than 15 minutes per game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm with WOW!! on saying we have a log jam at the 3. We need a starter quality 2 guard and an upgrade to the PF position. I really don't want to see us draft someone at a position where we have a ton of young talent. If MKG gets his confidence going, and develops a reasonable jumper, he is playing big minutes right alongside Al. I don't want to draft a player that won't contribute more than 15 minutes per game.

We would spend 2 top 10 picks on 1 position. And I'm not suppose to question the direction of this team???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...