Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has Stewart killed our running game?


Pantherman

Recommended Posts

Misleading.

Williams has gotten more carries and opportunities to break free. Consider this, had D-Will been stopped by 49er defenders in that 27 yard run his YPC would have been in the 2.7-2.9 region.

 

 

Nope.

 

Usually the more running backs carry, their YPC takes a dip. For DWill to get 4+ YPC on his carries, is really good. It's really good for any RB.

 

If the person I quoted was actually stating facts, Stewart and Tolbert would have a higher YPC due to less carries since they "consistently get 4 yards a carry".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Scott getting hurt killed our running game...stewart is just fine but we need to pick a back and just go with him. we sub way way too much

 

^ This

 

Chris Scott is a big body, and him being out hurt our run game a great deal, but at the same time, it's helped our pass pro with Chandler in instead of him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Combination of opposing defenses stacking the box and our o-line being beyond depleted. We're gonna have to lean on Cam again unfortunately.

 

It seem like at certain points our RBs will break off one solid one. I like to see more creative runs. That D.Will TD, that pitch to Tolbert where the San Fran guy got injured. Running just conventional running plays like we still have the same oline isn't working

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like Deangelo, I just wish he'd keep his legs moving and break a few tackles here and there. I've seen him just drop a few times this year instead of fighting for the extra yard or two.

That pass on the last drive against the Pats where he spinned off that defender and jumped forward for a few extra yards was nice. I want to see that DWill more often.

 

agreed IMO i think he does that to avoid fumbling which is smart,we have stewart and tolbert to get those tough yards

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm, yep.

More carries = more opportunities. No way to shake it. D-Will has gotten majority of the snaps regardless and has broken a few tackles outside for big gains. For the most part, D-Will has been averaging LESS than two yards inbetween the tackles. Tolbert and Stewart, on the other hand, have been averaging three yards.

 

You would think that if you didn't understand how YPC works.

 

I've studied YPC of current and past RBs in the NFL and there's a pattern. Most of the time more carries means the YPC takes a dip.

 

The reason is because it includes hits behind the line of scrimmage and not just long runs. Over time, the short or negative yardage runs even out the long positive yardage runs.

 

This is why those RBs that have a high amount of carries and a high YPC are considered great.

 

Look at Arian Foster for example. His highest amount of carries was last year and his YPC was 4.1. The year before it was 4.4 on almost 70 less carries. This year its 4.5 on about 220 less carries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo. Exactly my line of thinking. Our running game is too predictable. We need to modify our approach in order to give our backs a better chance.

 

Last year is was unpredictable but ended up with lots of carries with a loss of yards.  I think there is about zero chance they go back to that running scheme considering they aren't getting the huge losses this year.  It is a much more conservative approach this year but they are getting positive yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year is was unpredictable but ended up with lots of carries with a loss of yards.  I think there is about zero chance they go back to that running scheme considering they aren't getting the huge losses this year.  It is a much more conservative approach this year but they are getting positive yards.

 

But right now with the loss of guys, when need to do something other than conventional. The delays, the pulling of guards, the pitches(statisically considered throws by Cam) runs I've seen over the past 3 something weeks have worked while others is getting stuffed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...