Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tuck Rule.


Snake

Recommended Posts

Yeah I knew they'd get it back but I was waiting on the flag. Odd. Announcers didn't say anything about either.

Of course not...They were too wrapped up in the tuck rule...The reality is that he threw a pass backwards if they are going to call it an incomplete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just dont understand how if it was thrown forward it was not grounding and if it was thrown sideways it was not a fumble. I understand that the WR can try to tuck the ball if his arm is moving forward but if there is no WR around its still grounding if your in the box. They really need to take this grey rule out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just dont understand how if it was thrown forward it was not grounding and if it was thrown sideways it was not a fumble. I understand that the WR can try to tuck the ball if his arm is moving forward but if there is no WR around its still grounding if your in the box. They really need to take this grey rule out.

Diggs blocked the ball from what I saw. Once he touched the ball all bets were off as far as intentional grounding goes. It appeared to me that he tried to tuck the ball and take the sack, but did it too late and Diggs knocked the ball out of his hands before he got it fully tucked, which caused the refs to say arm coming forward and the reversal of the call on the field.

If I'm wrong, then you have a point...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diggs blocked the ball from what I saw. Once he touched the ball all bets were off as far as intentional grounding goes. It appeared to me that he tried to tuck the ball and take the sack, but did it too late and Diggs knocked the ball out of his hands before he got it fully tucked, which caused the refs to say arm coming forward and the reversal of the call on the field.

If I'm wrong, then you have a point...

Yea that would make since cause if it his a player then falls to the ground then its incomplete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...