Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Romo out for the last game


Jangler

Recommended Posts

So was it just the plain arrogance and general assholiness of Garrett and Jerry Jones to continue pushing the lies about him being day-to-day, going through therapy, etc. while everyone else in the world was saying he's done?

 

LookingUplink.jpg

 

There wasn't anything "assholiness" about what either of them did. It's called not showing your hands until you have too. It's not like they put Romo's life in danger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There wasn't anything "assholiness" about what either of them did. It's called not showing your hands until you have too. It's not like they put Romo's life in danger.

 

C'mon, the only 2 people on the planet who didn't know Romo was done were Jones and Garrett?

 

It might have worked had not every credible NFL reporter in the country reported Romo's demise hours before Garrett's denial presser. It was pretty embarrassing for the Cowboys and nowhere was it more painfully obvious than seeing Garrett standing there with his dick in his hand at the presser.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...