Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I wonder how Cutler's contract will affect Cam's

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Evengelion Newbie

Evengelion

Posted
Posted

I just lurked around the Bears forum and found most fans supporting Cutler. Even though he has done NOTHING for their franchise.

Take this from me, there are a lot of players' fan. Some for racial reason and some are just casual fans. It looks like we have a lot of players' fan in Carolina. Some of them come here just to announce to us that they support Brees, Brady, Luck, Rodgers, Gabbert, Sanchez, Henne, Quinn,...Shall I keep going? The QB position is very sacred to some. It's not just another position on the field to some. It has to meet certain criteria. Fans can objectively debate between AJ Green and Calvin Johnson with no stress but debating Ryan Leaf and Aquili Smith evoke so many emotions. The NFL and their fans have ways to go. By the way, who do you think is the better QB, Bridgewater or Winston? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FootballMaestro Newbie

FootballMaestro

Posted
Posted

Well, I wouldn't exactly argue that Rodgers is better than Cam either. Passing wise Rodgers is definitely better but as an all around player Cam got that hands down. In a team where it's not guaranteed that your receivers will catch your passes for you like the panthers Cam is definitely a better player. But if you have a team where you can go 5 WR set and all can catch balls for you, Rodgers is certainly better. QBs are as good as their WRs. Cam is not. Cam can control the clock and eat you up 5 yards at a time with his legs when WRs are in their dropsy mode and he's done that a lot this year. Cam is just a monster. Rodgers is very successful with the WC throwing the ball every down and his stats reflect it. Don't get it twisted people.

 

Rodgers is a specialized player and and Cam is the jack of all trades. Some coaches prefer the jack of all trades more than the specialist. Fact, if you have good skill players and the QB throws the ball a lot, that QB will accumulate gaudy stats. Brees, roaders, etc.

I was talking about Rogers first few years in the NFL Riding the pine behind Brett Farve. 

 

Yeah, Cam was better his first three years, we can say; cause Rogers didn't play! Lol

 

Rogers was learning to be a QB those years behind Farve, as Cam is learning now on the job. 

 

As far as today: Rogers is arguably the best. And is where Cam aspires to be (along with some good weapons and playing in a QB friendly system, such as Rogers, and unlike Cam now). 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ok2h8pep
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By ok2h8pep · Posted

      Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • 45catfan
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By 45catfan · Posted

      Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • MHS831
      Round 1: The Carolina Panthers select OT Monroe Freeling (Georgia)

      By MHS831 · Posted

      When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...