Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN latest...Crabtree...the difference

ladypanther

By ladypanther,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

49erVisitor Newbie

49erVisitor

Posted
Posted

We were moving the ball pretty darn well against you guys our last meeting. We just settled for FG's because our red-zone playcalling is terrible. Hopefully, that won't be the case this time with Crabtree back and maybe VD won't be concussed by the grass again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kurb Newbie

Kurb

Posted
Posted

We were moving the ball pretty darn well against you guys our last meeting. We just settled for FG's because our red-zone playcalling is terrible. Hopefully, that won't be the case this time with Crabtree back and maybe VD won't be concussed by the grass again...

I dunno, we have some pretty hard grass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newtcase Mentor

Newtcase

Posted
Posted

We were moving the ball pretty darn well against you guys our last meeting. We just settled for FG's because our red-zone playcalling is terrible. Hopefully, that won't be the case this time with Crabtree back and maybe VD won't be concussed by the grass again...

 

Hahahaha srsly? You had 151 total yards of offense, if you call that moving the ball well then I hope you guys move the ball well again this Sunday!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jptaylor84 Newbie

jptaylor84

Posted
Posted

Didn't they have 51 and 54 yard field goals in that 9 points? And one redzone stop which panthers should of had a fumble when Davis got the ruling down about the five yard line which made there 9 points! That's not moving the ball! Most of the time you started at the 30 or 40 because our offence could not get going, so we punted back to for a short field! As someone said not a lot of yardage

Link to comment
Share on other sites
49erVisitor Newbie

49erVisitor

Posted
Posted

Hahahaha srsly? You had 151 total yards of offense, if you call that moving the ball well then I hope you guys move the ball well again this Sunday!

 

We WERE moving the ball well (i mean to put up 3 FG's you have to be getting good field possesion/drives) until we stopped feeding Gore for some unknown reason. Maybe he got knicked up, i can't recall but he had 16 rushes for 81 yards and I'm pretty sure that was mostly, if not all accumulated in the first half of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jptaylor84 Newbie

jptaylor84

Posted
Posted

One of Those field goals the drive started midfield because of a blocked field goal or punt in the first half! I think you had one good drive where gore was running nowhere and then harbaugh tried to get the panthers d to jump on a 4th&1 at the panthers 2 but we didn't and you got a field goal that was from the bad ruling on the Davis fumble or strip

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

We WERE moving the ball well (i mean to put up 3 FG's you have to be getting good field possesion/drives) until we stopped feeding Gore for some unknown reason. Maybe he got knicked up, i can't recall but he had 16 rushes for 81 yards and I'm pretty sure that was mostly, if not all accumulated in the first half of the game.

 

Damn you are fuging clueless....moving the ball well?

 

You had a total of 151 net yards the entire game....105 passing and 46 rushing.

 

That is NOT moving the ball well.

 

You settled for long FG's because you could not move the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
49erVisitor Newbie

49erVisitor

Posted
Posted

Damn you are fuging clueless....moving the ball well?

 

You had a total of 151 net yards the entire game....105 passing and 46 rushing.

 

That is NOT moving the ball well.

 

You settled for long FG's because you could not move the ball.

 

Frank Gore had 81 rushing yards on 16 carries.

 

5.1 ypc is moving the ball genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newtcase Mentor

Newtcase

Posted
Posted

We WERE moving the ball well (i mean to put up 3 FG's you have to be getting good field possesion/drives) until we stopped feeding Gore for some unknown reason. Maybe he got knicked up, i can't recall but he had 16 rushes for 81 yards and I'm pretty sure that was mostly, if not all accumulated in the first half of the game.

 

No you weren't and you're demonstrating how little you actually know about the game.

 

The only drive you had over six offensive plays was your fist drive, which incidentally should have ended in an interception that hit Captain Munnerlyn in the hands!

 

Another field goal came on a punt that we blocked that took a strange bounce and you recovered a ball on our 40 that we should have gotten at midfield.

 

The last field goal came on the worst call/review of the season, the Vernon Davis fumble that was ruled incomplete.  Every commentator and analyst outside of San Francisco called it ridiculous.

 

Furthermore, Gore wasn't running well.  He carried the ball 16 times for 82 yards, three carries went for 42 of those.  That means he gained 40 yards on the other 13 carries, a 3 ypc average.  In reality most of those were stuffs.  Add to it that we sacked Kaep six times and kept you in long yardage on a lot of possessions.  Are you a big fan of running the draw on 3rd and 25?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
49erVisitor Newbie

49erVisitor

Posted
Posted

No you weren't and you're demonstrating how little you actually know about the game.

 

The only drive you had over six offensive plays was your fist drive, which incidentally should have ended in an interception that hit Captain Munnerlyn in the hands!

 

Another field goal came on a punt that we blocked that took a strange bounce and you recovered a ball on our 40 that we should have gotten at midfield.

 

The last field goal came on the worst call/review of the season, the Vernon Davis fumble that was ruled incomplete.  Every commentator and analyst outside of San Francisco called it ridiculous.

 

Furthermore, Gore wasn't running well.  He carried the ball 16 times for 82 yards, three carries went for 42 of those.  That means he gained 40 yards on the other 13 carries, a 3 ypc average.  In reality most of those were stuffs.  Add to it that we sacked Kaep six times and kept you in long yardage on a lot of possessions.  Are you a big fan of running the draw on 3rd and 25?  

 

lolwut? How is that NOT running well? Just because he had 3 big runs that makes it less effective? My whole point is we had something working with Gore and we let up on it for reasons I am not sure about. I'm not saying we were having a cakewalk up and down the field on you guys but we were able to run, something that you guys thought we weren't going to be able to do against your uber Dline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

We WERE moving the ball well (i mean to put up 3 FG's you have to be getting good field possesion/drives) until we stopped feeding Gore for some unknown reason. Maybe he got knicked up, i can't recall but he had 16 rushes for 81 yards and I'm pretty sure that was mostly, if not all accumulated in the first half of the game.

He had 41 yards in the first half

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Paa Langfart
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By Paa Langfart · Posted

      With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • frankw
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By frankw · Posted

      Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Swaggasaurus
      Jeremy Fowler: Panthers draft day intel

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...