Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I wanna know


Hawk

Recommended Posts

Hawks are the only acceptable outcome on top.

Fug Peyton Manning.

Keys will be can the Hawks actually put a rush on Peyton?

In other words can the Legion of Boom make Manning hold the ball long enough with their coverage skills so the pass rush can hit paydirt?

I think they will, Manning will get stuffed a time or two and turn over the football twice.

Seattle wins, 27-20.

 

Rejoice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look for it to be a very competitive game.  If the weather is not an issue, then I see the Broncos winning a close one.  If the weather is disruptive in the least, then I see Wilsons ability to become an add'l runner as the key.  It is that close for me.

 

Windy or cold or snowy gives the edge to Hawks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windy or cold or snowy gives the edge to Hawks

 

That's a funny sounding statement in context, given that you're talking about an opposing team from Denver :lol:

 

Aaaaahhh, but factor Peyton's rep for poor performance in bad weather in there, and... :unsure:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a funny sounding statement in context, given that you're talking about an opposing team from Denver :lol:

 

Aaaaahhh, but factor Peyton's rep for poor performance in bad weather in there, and... :unsure:

 

 

Yep, last weekend in Denver for the AFC championship, it was 50 and sunny.  50 in Denver feels like 65 here, so a wonderful day for Peyton.

 

Seattle is just crap weather all the time, rain, snow, wind, etc.  Just feel like even though it is Seattle, they still get worse weather as a whole, and yes, Peytons long history of being a little off the mark in cold did factor in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These teams haven't played since 2010 excluding preseason.

 

Denver will need to run the ball effectively to buy Manning time and options.

 

Seattle has to score. Their offense dropped a few duds in the regular season. Against the Broncos scoring is not optional.

 

Russel Wilson was huge against ATL last year and Manning has beaten great defenses  before (Bears in SB).

 

I'll take Manning's experience. Seattle didn't look good against 49ers. Broncos have looked solid all playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think SEA could follow the SD blueprint to win (like in the TNF game). A good steady Skittles diet, with a good short intermediate passing game when needed. If they can limit the amount of Bronco possessions and string a couple stops along the way, I think things might look good for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Running or being able to run the ball allows you to control the game. You control the pace, score, and time of possession. It does also allow your defense to rest and when they do get on the field, go 100%. That in turn forces the opponents offense not have 3 and outs. That's huge pressure, if the other team is just running the ball while having 14 plays drives.  If you are able to get 3.5 yards a carry and mix in smoke routes that gain similar while allowing the clock to run......you control the game.  Deal is nearly all rules changes in the 25 years have helped the passing part. Young folks and gambling folk want to see 37-45 scores. Those 10-16 score teams are poison and toxic, I don't care personally just win. I can enjoy a 6-3 slug-out just the same as 50-42.  There just too many factors to go over. Running used to be important for playoff ball, cause it was before half the league got domes. Running the ball in snow, cold, wet conditions was the path. Like NE played in that awful division each for 20 years during the Dynasty run, they normally had the #1 seed and home field. Thats why bill always had a #1 defense and enough offense to win. It was a huge advantage.    I have thought you need to pass in order to score, THEN you must be able to run the ball with 7minutes remaining to keep the other teams offense off the field. But if you're setup to pass and get no experience during the game to try rushing plays, who knows what you can do. So I feel you truly need a balanced attack, that's the key and main goal. Run for first downs went you need too and pass for TDs when you need too.       
    • The whole team seemed to be in a funk that game. At the end of the day I think the Super Bowl week and everything that came with it paired with the coaching staff stubbornly refusing to make any significant changes for their opponent was a perfect storm of circumstances that is exactly how you lose a Super Bowl. When you add the refs and the league blatantly trying to get Peyton Manning a walk off into the sunset ring it's a wrap. We needed someone with attitude willing to fight back. I wish we had 89 just for that one game. I think the result would have been different. He wouldn't have let that bullshit fly. He may have gotten himself ejected in the process. But it would have lit a fire under the rest of the team. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...