Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dee Ford - Possible Hardy Replacement (If We Lose Hardy)?


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

I can't claim to be a college football expert by any stretch of the imagination...  I just generally don't care until the season gets down to the homestretch, so, some of you will be much more informed on some of these guys than I am. 

 

What is the general perception of Ford?

 

I know he killed it at the Senior Bowl, which is where I first noticed him.  So, I looked up his draft projections, stats, etc., and he is 6'2", 243 lbs., and listed as a DE.  I find it highly unlikely that he plays DE as a rookie if he is coming in at 243 lbs.  It's possible, but not likely. 

 

So, does anyone think he remains a DE coming into the league?  Furthermore, any sources out there that thinks he can bulk up anymore? 

 

One thing is for sure, he is explosive, and I don't see that changing.  But, I just don't see him playing on the line being that light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like some has mentioned, we should trade Hardy to Oakland for a 2nd round pick.  

 

There are 5 solid DE's in this draft (Clowney, Murphy, Ford, Jeffcoat, & Crichton).  There is no doubt we need to take a WR & OT with our first two picks, but with our late 2nd round pick, it would be wise to take a DE ( best available).  CB's are deep this year.  We can take one with our 3rd rd pick.  Most likely available (Victor Hampton, Chris Davis, Pierre Desir,  Jaylen Watkins, EJ Gaines, etc....plenty of talent.)  Also, don't forget that Aaron Colvin who is a solid CB tore is ACL and now is a late 6th or 7th round pick.  Another guy we jump on later.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I saw Josh Norris say that Ford's first couple seasons will be in the role sort of like how we have Addison right now, pure pass rusher from the edge since he lacks the bulk and strength to play the run, and I'm not sure how much more weight he can add without taking away from his speed.  He has good bend and hand use to get around Tackles, but needs to add more moves other than a speed rush to continue to excel as a rusher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that he can play DE but Im not going to take a chance with him. Dont want him being the next Everette Brown.

For the guys that want a DE, Im telling you guys, go check out "MARCUS SMITH" (14.5 sacks). The former QB turned DE is a stud who could be have in the 2nd.

What school did he attend?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't claim to be a college football expert by any stretch of the imagination...  I just generally don't care until the season gets down to the homestretch, so, some of you will be much more informed on some of these guys than I am. 

 

What is the general perception of Ford?

 

I know he killed it at the Senior Bowl, which is where I first noticed him.  So, I looked up his draft projections, stats, etc., and he is 6'2", 243 lbs., and listed as a DE.  I find it highly unlikely that he plays DE as a rookie if he is coming in at 243 lbs.  It's possible, but not likely. 

 

So, does anyone think he remains a DE coming into the league?  Furthermore, any sources out there that thinks he can bulk up anymore? 

 

One thing is for sure, he is explosive, and I don't see that changing.  But, I just don't see him playing on the line being that light.

 

 

 

The answer is already on the roster ............Horton, Addission would probably be the starter knowing the system and having experience & size to play DE.   I rather spend the pick on a needed position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that he can play DE but Im not going to take a chance with him. Dont want him being the next Everette Brown.

For the guys that want a DE, Im telling you guys, go check out "MARCUS SMITH" (14.5 sacks). The former QB turned DE is a stud who could be have in the 2nd.

Are you sure about that?  I looked him up and all I could find was him having 9.5 career sacks., not 14.5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...