Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess who got 16 reps on the bench press today


top dawg

Recommended Posts

It was somewhat amazing that this little guy got so many reps.  If you look at him, you'd probably say "naaaahhh!"  I was expecting big Benjamin to get more than he got (which I believe was 12).  Brandon Coleman got 21, as did Jordan Matthews. Cody Latimer was the top at 23. Jeff Janis and Mike Campanro got 20, and Martavis Bryant and Sammy Watkins tied with Cooks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a guy who can go up, and get the ball. Stop looking for the next Steve Smith. Too many Marty Hurney's here.

 

That's just fuging stupid. Cooks is on his way to cementing a first round grade and perhaps is a nice surprise coming out of the NFL Combine. Smith ain't got poo to do with it. 

 

BTW, Smith was a total surprise. We got fuging lucky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's just fuging stupid. Cooks is on his way to cementing a first round grade and perhaps is a nice surprise coming out of the NFL Combine. Smith ain't got poo to do with it. 

 

It's great to be enamored with a player, but we are unlikely to be able to draft him anyway, and Cam Newton needs a bigger target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's great to be enamored with a player, but we are unlikely to be able to draft him anyway, and Cam Newton needs a bigger target.

 

I'm not enamored with anyone. Like I have said before, I will be good with whomever G-man picks. Furthermore, Cam needs play-makers---no matter the size. That's what Cam needs: play-makers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...