Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Billy Turner at 28? --edit (at 60?)


davos

Recommended Posts

Sorry for the bump, but I only do one mock a year so I put some research into it, and according to a few searches; Billy Turner gave up a big fat 0 SACKS last year at LT... just saying. Now I know he played at NDSU, but it's damn sure is impressive when you don't get best even once in an entire season at any level.

I wouldn't take him at 28, but I would bet that he will be gone sometime in the second round.

 

 

already liked him a lot, didnt know about him not giving up a single sack for the entire season. that is impressive as hell. 

 

with his measurables id take him at 28 in a heart beat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm asking this not so much because he likely won't be there come round 2 IMO but rather if we think he's a future LT, does that make him 28th pick worthy?

I have only read great reviews about the kid and he can possibly play at a foundational position for an offense in the NFL.

Whatsayyou?

 

He is an interesting prospect. I am somewhat concerned of the level of talent he has faced but it is not like others have not overcome coming from a small school. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for the bump, but I only do one mock a year so I put some research into it, and according to a few searches; Billy Turner gave up a big fat 0 SACKS last year at LT... just saying. Now I know he played at NDSU, but it's damn sure is impressive when you don't get best even once in an entire season at any level.

I wouldn't take him at 28, but I would bet that he will be gone sometime in the second round.

Yeah, he literally destroyed the competition at NDSU. I mean, he was on a different world than those other guys.

I'd take Turner before I took Cyrus, honestly. There's much less bust potential, from a medical seven year outlook. I'd also take him over Moses, who I think is the most overrated prospect at the back end of the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 no, 60 yes i wouldnt mind. at the senior bowl, he got beat consistently and struggled with rushers who go from speed to power. he does have good feet, and plays with the nastiness coaches love, but he has some of the worst technique in a top ranking OT.that bad technique leads to sacks, and i have seen some claim he should be a OG because of his feet, run blocking skills, and bad technique.

 

i would try him at RT 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 no, 60 yes i wouldnt mind. at the senior bowl, he got beat consistently and struggled with rushers who go from speed to power. he does have good feet, and plays with the nastiness coaches love, but he has some of the worst technique in a top ranking OT.that bad technique leads to sacks, and i have seen some claim he should be a OG because of his feet, run blocking skills, and bad technique.

 

i would try him at RT 1st.

 

you got something to back that up? 

 

i thought he did well at senior bowl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you got something to back that up? 

 

i thought he did well at senior bowl. 

 

 

Eric Galko: North Dakota State offensive tackle Billy Turner struggled with his leverage and blocking posture throughout the practice, but really stood out with his hand strength strike. At tackle, he displayed adequate foot speed but he’ll need to correct waist-bending issues.

 

 

Josh Norris: Billy Turner will get yelled at for tech, but his functional strength is great. Like that he’s getting snaps at G too.

 

 

Lance Zierlein: Jaguars offensive line coach George Yarno got into Turner with a butt-chewing a couple of times as Turner failed to execute basic functions of the one on one drill.  Turner bounced back with good one on one pass pro reps against Deandre Coleman and Brent Urban and handled himself well in the scrimmage portion at tackle and guard.  I’m excited to see how Turner continues to progress under the watchful eye of Yarno.

As you can see, it wasn’t all positive for Turner. Michael DiRocco of ESPN thought Turner had a hard time with some speedy SEC edge rushers in one-on-one drills, but he chalked that up to the step up in competition and a long layoff.

and when they did the live look in, Turner did get beat several times by DEs with counter moves especially Ford. Ford would get up field with his great speed, but counter with a bull rush, converting speed to power and knocking Turner off balance to get to the QB(bean bag). he could start off at RT, until he gets his technique fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and when they did the live look in, Turner did get beat several times by DEs with counter moves especially Ford. Ford would get up field with his great speed, but counter with a bull rush, converting speed to power and knocking Turner off balance to get to the QB(bean bag). he could start off at RT, until he gets his technique fixed.

 

I am talking about the actual game, not the practices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am talking about the actual game, not the practices.

The real evaluation is made during practices by scouts, and not the game. Hence why most evaluators leave the day before the game because they already seen what they want. They may watch the tape of game, but most is done during the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a pretty well known fact that Turner is way better at pass protection than he is at run blocking, why you would want him to play right tackle (the side we run to the most), is beyond me.

The quote used even said that he did well in one-on-one pass protection drills.

I actually heard he was a good run blocker and will struggle in pass protection vs some DEs.that same quote you are referring to also said he struggled with pass pro as well.the jags ol coach even had to get on him about his technique.

Plus his feet and run blocking skills make some want him at OG. If he couldn't run block, I don't think they will be talking about putting in that position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually heard he was a good run blocker and will struggle in pass protection vs some DEs.that same quote you are referring to also said he struggled with pass pro as well.the jags ol coach even had to get on him about his technique.

Plus his feet and run blocking skills make some want him at OG. If he couldn't run block, I don't think they will be talking about putting in that position.

Interesting, I'll have to do some more research. I have read that he does get upfield well during running plays, I just haven't seen him hold his block really well on running plays designed to his side.

Also, his pass protection was really good against Kansas State. I definitely recommend watching that tape, he was phenomenal. He recorded 10 knockdowns and graded out with a 96 percent rating against the Wildcats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, I'll have to do some more research. I have read that he does get upfield well during running plays, I just haven't seen him hold his block really well on running plays designed to his side.

Also, his pass protection was really good against Kansas State. I definitely recommend watching that tape, he was phenomenal. He recorded 10 knockdowns and graded out with a 96 percent rating against the Wildcats.

Half way thru watching his cut ups of this game and he has at least 3-4 pancakes and 3-4 where he drives the guy at least 5 yards down the field. Pass pro looks decent at times, but he also bends at the waist a lot. NFL DEs are going to kill him with leverage because some times he stands straight up while kick sliding.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...