Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jason Avant Visiting Panthers Monday


Black

Recommended Posts

No, but if you add that they'd be pretty much identical,

Difference is we're saving an insane amount of money that would've been owed to Smith the following two years if he were kept.

Gettleman did the right thing.

 

That remains to be seen. It's still April guys, remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a big gap, and I don't think it will grow smaller next season. We don't have any downfield threats to let our current receivers do work (their part) as career number threes (and fours).

Underwoods yard per catch was one of the highest in the league last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Olsen, our best tight end, our fabled true number one receiver last year. Olsen had slightly more yards (71), but played all 16 games. Olsen also managed a grand total of six touchdowns. I don't think his life will be easier next season when he's doubled on every down.

no team is going to double Olsen...come on man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Functionally we had an offense that was one of the worst in the league, and in my opinion is was form the person calling the plays, not the players. We basically had a MIA number three receiver until Ginn last year, and still manage to take giant steps backwards. I personally think Smith was still a great receiver last season, despite his numbers and injury. I also think he would have been a asset if actually moved to role that didn't involve carrying our passing offense on his back.

 

The guys we signed weren't signed by anyone else for a reason. Our players we let walk were signed immediately by good (possibly contender) teams for a reason, whether you can see it or not. I don't think you can dispute the Patriots or Baltimore know how to win. Paying Smith to leave doesn't help our cap. Overpaying players doesn't help our cap. Creating holes in our roster doesn't help our chances to win.

 

Also, we didn't do pretty well. Our passing attack was the worst I've seen in years. It's the sole reason we didn't progress in the playoffs. Our 12-4 record (that some are now disputing, because it helps there arguments) was from our defense, and Cam Newton making the offense work, somehow, someway.

 

Functionally our offense was ranked:

 

11th in yards per drive

10th in points per drive

7th in turnovers per drive

16th in interceptions per drive

3rd in fumbles per drive

3rd in plays per drive

2nd in TOP

5th in drive success rate

9th in TD's per drive

13th in FG's per drive

17th in punts per drive

12th on 3 and outs per drive

8th in TD's in the redzone

5th in average lead

 

Will people please stop saying our O was one of the worst in the league and educated themselves.

 

Avant has a career catch percentage of almost 65%. I think we're better off having a guy like that than not. Smittys is about 58% for a frame of reference.

 

Cutting Smitty saves us  about 10 mill in cap space for 2015 and 2016 apiece. You have to look beyond this year to make sense of the cut.

 

In the playoffs our #2 ranked D disappeared midway through the 2nd quarter. They continually capitulated by being over aggressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Underwoods yard per catch was one of the highest in the league last year.

 

Yes he managed to break a few long balls off. However if you read some of the talk from Tampa fans you'll know that a lot of them see him as a project number three or a solid fourth, fifth receiver. My friend that loves that god forsaken team actually told me he would rather have a new fifth or six round receiver on the team than keep trying with Underwood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smith was mediocre at best this season at age 34. He also damaged the pcl in his knee.

Did you want to keep him at a 9mil cap hit in '15 & 11mil cap hit in '16 at age 36-37?

Dave cutting Smith shouldn't have came at a shock. Keeping him would've been stupid.

 

That remains to be seen. He had a down season, did you want to cut him after 2011 as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Functionally our offense was ranked:

 

11th in yards per drive

10th in points per drive

7th in turnovers per drive

16th in interceptions per drive

3rd in fumbles per drive

3rd in plays per drive

2nd in TOP

5th in drive success rate

9th in TD's per drive

13th in FG's per drive

17th in punts per drive

12th on 3 and outs per drive

8th in TD's in the redzone

5th in average lead

 

Will people please stop saying our O was one of the worst in the league and educated themselves.

 

Avant has a career catch percentage of almost 65%. I think we're better off having a guy like that than not. Smittys is about 58% for a frame of reference.

 

Cutting Smitty saves us  about 10 mill in cap space for 2015 and 2016 apiece. You have to look beyond this year to make sense of the cut.

 

In the playoffs our #2 ranked D disappeared midway through the 2nd quarter. They continually capitulated by being over aggressive.

 

What was our overall offense ranked again, and our passing offense?

 

We should have let Hardy walk, and kept our best receiver, and signed a better one this off-season. We can cut many players and look beyond this year on how it affects our cap situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...