Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

John Fox "refuses to rule out signing Michael Vick"


Recommended Posts

I was watching ABC earlier and they were asking him if the Panthers are interested in signing Vick and he said something like even though we have strong quarterbacks i'm still gonna be open on signing Vick.

Carolina Panthers: Head coach John Fox refused to rule out signing Vick, but said "right now we're pretty set at quarterback." The Panthers gave Jake Delhomme a five-year extension in the offseason. (Aug. 2)

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2009-07-30-michael-vick-list_N.htm

I believe in second chances and this guys deserves a second chance and I think it would be great if he played for Carolina. I know its unlikely but it would be amazing with a winner like him on our roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he's not coming here.

especially with Kemo now out.

please stop coming in here with your "exciting, new original ideas"

especially when this same garbage is plastered all over the front page

This isnt an idea of mine it is what the HC of the Carolina Panthers said. The Carolina Huddle Forums is meant for us to bring recent news on what is going on with the Panthers. And wtf does Kemo have to do with anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, he said, in typical Fox jargon that "they never rule signing anyone out."

it means nothing.

The problem with your post is that it isnt recent news.

Its been posted about 37 times-today.

Kemo has to do with every bit of it.

We have no cap space as it is, would you rather us look at adding another QB at a position that's set, or would you rather us actually address a position(DT) in need, with that tiny amount of cap space we have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...