CPantherKing

Can DJ be the playmaker he needs to be???

Burns and Brown imploding

Run straight at Brown. Horrible

The first round picks on offense are not doing much to prove their worth

1st down if it were not for Ickey

Ickey killed that drive with his 5 yard mental mistake

Foreman is not CMC. Stop it with those developing screens to Foreman

free sack for Burns Lamar messed up. Failed to identify the defense and blitz.

It was 3rd down with 3 WR and no DJ. That was what I pointed out... Got the 1st down with the penalty. DJ is not showing up again. Especially in the red zone. Disappointing for a 5 year receiver who is suppose to be a #1.

They took DJ Moore off the field

DJ Moore with the drop. DJ being DJ. Not showing up 3 weeks out of every 4 weeks.

The discipline on defense is much more apparent with Wilks in control Now if only McAdoo can do the same for the offense with his coaching instead of being safe and vanilla. Guess McAdoo does not trust Baker.

Defensive coaching/game planning looking much better under Wilks

Barno > YGM

Amare Barno should have been getting more playing time

Baker is playing scared. His hitch step wreaks with fear.

Baker looking uneasy in that pocket... even with 5 seconds in the pocket

Panthers run blocking OL ftw

Panthers best shot. Keep Lamar contained and take away the deep pass. Let him keep passing until he makes mental errors. Mental errors are Lamar's weakness.

3rd down? Can Brown beat Linderbaum?

Luvu with the boo boo

So you want to weight the QBs who never get an opportunity against all the 1st rounders who do get an opportunity. Try using snaps/starts. Use win%. Use GWD. Use any stat where you only weigh the QBs who have been given an opportunity to showcase. Are you going to tell me that all the QBs who never got an opportunity for various reasons would have never thrown a single completion or TD. Would they have never thrown an INT or got sacked for a safety? You know they all would produce something. What logic tells you they are a big fat 0? Because they never got a shot? So, if the opportunity did not fall in place for Warner or Delhomme, they would have never been capable of success in the NFL? They obviously were always capable and had to wait for the opportunity. The baseline is QBs who have received opportunities. Counting the QBs who have never gotten an opportunity would be skewing the data when the aim is the production of QBs in the NFL. You must remove all QBs who never receive an opportunity or make sure you reference you are counting all QBs who never stepped on an NFL field during a game. You may as well toss in all the QBs from college that tryout for teams and never get talked about eventhough you know that the NFL misses and there is a percentage of those QBs that would be successful in the NFL. You don't believe not a single one of those no names would never have success in the NFL. They just never got their opportunity since opportunities are limited. There are more Warners and Bradys out there. I guarantee it. You are wrong in tossing in all the QBs drafted/undrafted and never given a snap. I could take all the resumes/interviews in HR that get thrown out without ever considering them, and find that a large percentage of the resumes tossed found success with other companies. You would just count them as a 0 and use it to prove how your choice of employees are so much better than the resumes you tossed out. Look at all QBs given starts in the NFL, then get back to me.

And only 4 of these 11 first rounders won the SB for the team that drafted them. Now, 3 of the 6 non-first rounders have won for the team that drafted them. Also, 2 of 6 have gone to multiple SBs with the same team over this period of time while 2 of 11 first rounders have gone to multiple SBs with the same team over this period of time. You are guaranteed to waste draft capital on 1st round QBs. You can find just as many QBs outside of the 1st round that can win the SB for your team. You emphasized how these 1st round QBs keep coming up short for the team that drafts them. And there is a formula to find them consistently. It does not emphasize measurables or top collegiate QBs with power programs ranked by traditional college scouting and the combine.

Darnold has had 32 Losses and 4 game winning drives to prove his worth. If the front office cannot see their terrible decision, they all need to be replaced. A good evaluator of talent would know a players worth in 3 hours of practice and 10 games started.

Then you should take out the Mannings too because they are outliers for #1 overall picks. What does it look like if you take out the Mannings and Brady? Get rid of both sides of the skew. Not looking good for 1st round picks without the Mannings - NFL royalty. SB winners: Top 10 - Mahomes (2 years, rookie contract); Stafford (12 years, 3 contracts, not for drafted team). mid to late 1st - Joe Flacco (5 years, rookie contract). Others: Foles (5 years), Wilson (2 years) SB Losers: Top 10 - Newton, Burrow, Goff, Ryan. Others - Kaepernick, Jimmy G, For additional QBs starting their careers in the past 25 seasons. Winners. Warner, Roethlisberger, Brees, Rodgers. Losers: Delhomme, McNabb, Hasselbeck, Grossman. So, when you remove Brady and the Mannings because apparently we need to get rid of outliers and people whine about Brady skewing the numbers in favor of non-1st rounders, the numbers are.... EVEN. If you want to increase your chance of losing the SB, then draft a QB in the top 10 picks. If you want to have the same chances of getting to the SB or winning the SB, then don't waste all that draft capital on a 1st round QB. Spend it on your defense or a freakish receiver with great hands.