-
Posts
3,615 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by WUnderhill
-
If most posters on here want to have an honest discussion about something there isn’t usually a problem. Goat boy has just been spamming the past week and poo posting. That being said, it’s the night before the fuging draft and pretty much everybody is burnt out on this poo. You act like we should still be debating these QBs like we’re at the scouting combine. How about stop being whiny buzzkills and enjoy the draft. We have the #1 pick and some of you are acting like it’s a fuging funeral honestly just stfu and stop making these stupid threads.
-
You just don’t get it. It doesn’t matter what you think. It doesn’t matter how anybody would scheme anything. We aren’t NFL coaches. All that matters is what our coaches think and how they would scheme. If you think you’re smarter than them then go ahead and send in your resume. You have no credibility here and nobody except Gerry Green wants to have a conversation with you after you’ve spent the past 2 weeks acting like a complete ass.
-
Will Levis #1 to the Panthers Confirmed
WUnderhill replied to tukafan21's topic in Carolina Panthers
Yeah for everybody who liked to call him S.c.a.m Newton -
Will Levis #1 to the Panthers Confirmed
WUnderhill replied to tukafan21's topic in Carolina Panthers
Can you believe there was once a need for this… -
Will Levis #1 to the Panthers Confirmed
WUnderhill replied to tukafan21's topic in Carolina Panthers
Try typing S…c….a…m Newton too. (Without the dots). -
CJ Stroud: I’m a football player, not a test taker
WUnderhill replied to NAS's topic in Carolina Panthers
Not treated as gospel, but thanks to goat boy we have to spend all of our time disputing his misinformation instead of talking about what the score could actually mean for Stroud and others. -
CJ Stroud: I’m a football player, not a test taker
WUnderhill replied to NAS's topic in Carolina Panthers
Doesn’t dispute the score. Says he’s not a “test taker”. Still, must be fake, goat boy says so. -
NFL Twitter account being very subtle
WUnderhill replied to Sean Payton's Vicodin's topic in Carolina Panthers
You guys really expect him to show up and take his medicine? I have my doubts. -
I just don’t want to miss his draft night melt down.
-
Don’t start it if you don’t like it in return. Hurry and get Gerry Green now.
-
Just enough time to switch profiles. Alt confirmed? Honestly, if we’re going to make rep a thing here, some people should have their privileges removed. These 2 losers just follow me around and poo for no reason.
-
Definitely, it’s important to interpret all of these numbers within the context of the film and all the other data. That’s why we just gotta trust our staff. It’s not like we have Matt Rhule making decisions so I’m good with whoever they think is best.
-
So, they get a higher score for “completing” more deep throws. I used the word “attempting” but it’s not what I meant, so poor word choice on my part. I wasn’t suggesting that the QBs intentionally inflated their scores.
-
Will Levis is a master troll it would be hilarious if he moved betting lines by trolling his friends.
-
I think they should take the guy that they think is best regardless of who the media thinks is the best, or who the fans think it will be. But yeah, if they’re gonna take Levis they should have done something to cool the Young hype and clue us in. Based on that, and on the reports that the team didn’t want the fan base to be blindsided, I still think it’s Young. All their breadcrumbs have pointed to Young as you said. But if not, just lol.
-
Maybe I’m not understanding the numbers exactly correctly so somebody can correct me if I’m wrong. It appears to me that players may get higher “True Accuracy” scores just by attempting deeper throws. If true, it’s just a hard number for me to put a lot of weight in. That’s not to say it means nothing. It also appears that one of the most important numbers would be the DIFFERENCE between raw or true accuracy and adjusted accuracy, but we don’t get a total adjusted accuracy number because it is broken down into 3 categories, so I would be interested in knowing if there is a total adjusted accuracy number. I find it interesting that Stroud has such great accuracy numbers, yet slightly higher than average catches requiring adjustment. Does that mean his ball placement is not quite as elite as advertised? I don’t know. His contested catch % is slightly higher than average, and pass defended percentage is lower than average, which could again be an indicator of him throwing to his first read regardless of coverage and his receivers playing the ball better than their coverage. These are cool stats to look at and they could be interpreted several different ways. I trust the staff we’ve assembled to properly interpret this kind of stuff within the context of the film.
-
Wow did I offend you? Imagine me suggesting that the talent gap between his WRs and the opposing secondary may be less in the NFL, or that there are smarter coaches and players in the NFL. This may come as a shock, but the NFL playoffs are different than college.