-
Posts
19,908 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by ForJimmy
-
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
It’s like Lawrence struggling and his team finishing last. Or when Pederson kept pulling/playing Hurts and they finished with 4 wins. On a side note people should check how similar Hurts numbers were with Fields. -
Dane Brugler’s player rankings is a better source that all the mock drafts. He had most of last class’s QBs ranked outside the the first 64 picks.
-
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
You are referring to a decision made 2 years ago when Rhule was in control and passed on a player. Thinking they would feel the same way still is implying they think like Rhule. So your comment actually implies they are just as stupid. -
I doubt Richardson falls to the 2nd. I will be surprised if he drops out of the top 15.
-
A Statistical Analysis of Signing Carr vs. Trading for L. Jackson
ForJimmy replied to MHS831's topic in Carolina Panthers
I agree Lamar is a good bit better. Hell last year Carr had Adams, Walker, Renfro, and Jacobs while Jackson has Andrews and…… -
A Statistical Analysis of Signing Carr vs. Trading for L. Jackson
ForJimmy replied to MHS831's topic in Carolina Panthers
Really? Most have Carr rated higher than Jimmy G. Hell Jimmy G might have to find a backup job this year unless maybe the Jets sign him? -
Tillman would be a steal that late. He was Tennessee’s 1 before he got injured. Who is Avila going to replace?
-
A Statistical Analysis of Signing Carr vs. Trading for L. Jackson
ForJimmy replied to MHS831's topic in Carolina Panthers
24! -
I don’t think this applies anymore. Once picks are acquired they can be used. Seattle can trade Denver’s pick at 5 if they please for example.
-
I also think I am tired of seeing Reich get paired with a FA vet like he did every year with the Colts. I want to see him and his new staff (looking at you Caldwell), draft one and develop them the right way.
-
would you be opposed to moving back up for Bijan Robinson?
ForJimmy replied to micnificent28's topic in Carolina Panthers
I know he is legit and will probably do great in the NFL, I just don't think we need to go RB in the first yet. Once our team is more complete with less holes then a player like him early makes sense. I think we can get a decent RB in the 3rd/4th for the time being... -
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
He is all over the place as most reporters are this time of year. I'm sure it's by design for the GMs. It does make the offseason more exciting though. What else would we be talking about aside from our new staff (which I'm liking!)? -
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
https://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/bears/why-justin-fields-trade-rumors-shouldnt-worry-bears-fans -
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
I couldn't really follow that logic either? Unless he is assuming we move on from him after a year? -
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
I mean the currently think he is valued higher than the first overall pick right? Otherwise the GM wouldn't say he is their guy and the top pick is for sale. They seem to prefer to keep Fields and use the number one pick to acquire more picks and actually draft players that will fill actual needs. -
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
You think the same people are running the show that were running it then?? Rhule had full roster control and just traded for Darnold thinking he was the answer. -
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
I don't know if he will be great or not. The question is would you trade the number 9 pick for him? Is he worth the number 9 pick? The answer is an easy YES. It's all irrelevant because he isn't on the trade block much less for just a first round pick. -
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
It’s hypothetical. If the Chiefs would trade Mahomes for 3 1sts would you do it? Yes. The answer is yes because that is well below his value and we need a QB. Same logic applies here (obviously much less value than Mahomes). -
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
IF Chicago wants one of these QBs in this draft? I have seen nothing that indicates that so it's really just a bunch of made up clickbait. In fact the GM has said pretty much the opposite.... https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/35420112/bears-gm-quiets-draft-debate-backs-justin-fields-no-1-qb I mean IF the Jags fall in love with a QB in this draft then all that made up nonsense can be applied to Trevor Lawrence. The point is they aren't interested in drafting one to replace their young promising existing one just like the Bears. -
Would you trade 9 for Fields - straight up?
ForJimmy replied to musicman's topic in Carolina Panthers
The answer to this question is an easy yes. Most GMs without a QB would do this trade in a minute. The problem is the Bears aren't trading him and if they are it's for more than pick 9 (which is why the answer to this topic is an easy yes). Would you trade the number 9 pick for a young QB who has already flashed potential in one of the worst environments for a QB to develop? "Yes" is the answer. -
Don’t want Carr here, but that sounds like Stafford at Detroit…
-
Oh I agree, but will it be a career backup like Case Keenum or someone they expect to play a portion of the year like Brissett. Even if we get the top pick we would need a vet backup.
-
Yeah if we are trading for the top pick, it helps to do it early. That way you can build your team accordingly.