mrcompletely11

we are 2 years minimum from competing, thats best case scenario

I agree but if you know its a later pick, and you know you are keeping him from another team and if you know he super charges an already super charged offense and he fits in your timeline for winning. I can see a super bowl starved team doing it

So next year he is learning a new offense, coming off a major injury (he cannot practice until aug) with a new coaching staff and a shiny new #1 pick ahead of him. The odds are beyond astronomical fug rhule

I bet buffalo or kc blink and do it. He is the x factor in the playoffs

In the end this is what is going to happen I believe. We are 2 years minimum out from competing, why put cmac through that when we can get resources for him and put him in a better situation?

I like corral. I thought he should have been #2 on the depth chart even after we traded for Baker. We should have cut darnold and just started out like that. What rhule did to the kid is unforgivable and probably career ruining. Having said that its not a good sign that a huge knock on you was your slight frame and having and playing through injuries. Maybe his injury was a freak one but it doesnt really matter as he is out for the year

To trade cmc the strategy is easy. Call the chiefs. "Ive got an offer from the bills, send me your best and final" I would call the Bills "Ive got an offer from the chiefs, send me your best and final"

No matter what the pick is they are drafting a qb in the first come hell or high water. Would be nice to have their pick of all of them but they are getting someone. I thought up until yesterday we would be in the pick 5 range but after hearing Wilks say that Eason may be starting, Darnold not ready and baker not the starter even if healthy seems to me shenanigans are afoot and I like it

aye gotcha that makes sense ^^ and ^

Depends on who you believe. A first and say a 5th probably gets cmac traded. No team in their right mind is trading 2 firsts I think its somewhere between this what robinson is saying and what Jones is saying. Which is probably, they are asking a lot but would take a first in the end"

I dont know anything about Johnson good or bad but what does "ties to the region" have anything to do with being a nfl coach? That literally has no advantage whatsoever. I maybe get it for a college coach but NFL?

I think shaq has been average his entire career

They've lost their starting rb, LT, TE and QB. Bro if thats not decimated then I dont know what is

kittle And losing Lance was huge. They built the offense around him and he took all of the snaps in preseason as the starter

The odds are beyond astronomical at this point that MC will ever be a successful starter in the nfl

Their offense has been decimated with injuries. Shannon is going to be fine

Its going to be 8 weeks into the season before we even see him. Say he plays lights out for 3 weeks. You envision a team trading anything for him with 2/3 of the season basically over? Sam needs to ride the bench and never play again for us. Its pointless.

Okay, so he has improved then what?

Their defense is really really good. As is their running game. Bill B has gone old school the past few weeks.

yes we can

WIlks is trying to win, I doubt he dials it back with cmac this season especially given what I watched on Sunday.

2 things: Rhule would have been given a longer leash with Jones and I think he probably would have won some more games with jones. Mac isnt terrible per se, just limited

Because Fitt and Tepper have not shown the ability to have a long term plan. They think every year is a "win now" season.

Your assessment of the roster is pretty damn optimistic. A lot of the guys you are listing arent even playing.

100% but if Rhule had drafted him he still would have a job.