woahfraze

I like what Morgan has done, but let’s not ignore the full context. Having your roster contain this percentage of contributors from the past 2 drafts also speaks to how talent poor we are overall. If our roster were already better, you wouldn’t see this many young players make the roster or if they did, be relied on to contribute in this way.

Where’s Tommy Tremble?

I’m not going to sit here and say he played “amazing” in this game against the Eagles, but you’re selling this performance short. Stats do not tell the whole story here. If Leggette doesn’t drop that late 32 yard pass, Bryce ends up with 223 yards and 2TDs and doesn’t end up with 2 additional incompletions after that drop trying to force things to the end zone at the end of the game. So that’s be 20-32 instead of 19-34, good for a 62.5% completion percentage. His YOA would be 6.96 and his QB rating would have been 91.2. And the story everyone is talking about after the game is how Bryce led a game winning drive to beat one of the best teams in the league, the team we did not know at the time would become Super Bowl champions. But none of that happened all because of an awful drop by Leggette, something totally out of Bryce’s control. Bryce played well that game.

Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…). I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play. Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen.

We’ve invested enough money in the offensive line to justify a top or market free agent contract. The end of the year showed us that we have a unit that has developed good chemistry and can be really effective in both run blocking and pass protection. From a needs and capital allocation perspective, it makes much more sense to invest in the defense and another playmaker on offense. The offensive line should not be ignored this offseason, but the focus here should be to maintain/build depth in the position group rather than bring in a new starter.

Impressive catch by Coker.

Love it. Very nice 4th and 1 call. Falcons loaded up to stop the run on. Good fake. Easy pitch and catch.

Still should be a catch. On the regather into the chest (which you could possibly argue is really just part of the catch, not necessarily a bobble), Thielen still had two feet dragging when he got it into his chest.

The defense is absolute ass, but it was not even really bad defense on the last play specifically by the CB IMO. That was just an absolute dot by Penix. He did it twice in a row. Just got lucky on the first one that it was a tad long/a wierd “tie” with the CB on the catch.

I’m not saying culture is all that matters. But you just named: A 4th round pick (Amon Ra St Brown) Two 2nd round picks (LaPorta and Branch) The 20th overall pick (Ragnow) The 18th overall pick (Campbell) The 12th overall pick (Gibbs) The 7th overall pick (Sewell) The 2nd overall pick (Hutchinson) Two free agency signing (Montgomery and Smith) A player obtained in a trade (Goff) So only two players (Sewell and Hutchinson) where is losing ground in draft position from picking ~5 to ~10 would have mattered at all. All the rest were either the front office making the right choices with their draft selections or bring in veterans who fit what the staff wanted to do schematically, or the staff developing those players (FYI, it’s certainly a combination of those two things).

If you think that the Lions draft position had more to do with where they are as a franchise than Dan Campbell and the culture he has built, there’s nothing more to discuss with you. You just don’t get it. Our franchise isn’t in the toilet because we’ve ruined our draft position year after year. It’s because we haven’t had a Dan Campbell come in and implement a program and a culture of winning.

And look at what Darnold has done this year and how Mayfield has played in Tampa since leaving here. There is no way of knowing whether Herbert would have performed well here or if we would have ruined him.

Note the second sentence of my post….

There’s no guarantee we would have taken those players, even though we as fans wanted them. And there’s not guarantee the coaching staff we had at the time would have allowed/turned those players into the players they are today.

The team has to learn how to win. That’s inclusive of the players and the coaches. Hopefully getting this one under their belt will mean there are more the come.