csx

The draft would be more fun if the media didn't spend all their energy to out the selections. make it a lottery

The people that called him a pile jumper stat padder literally never watched him in college. He played exactly the same way. He bullied people.

They have to become good NFL qbs for it to matter. Just picking a QB is the easy part.

The amount of time this person sounds online searching is staggering. They could just provide a link to Google

I'd put Hardy over Burns as a DE as well. He did more than just speed rush on the edge Lathon and Greene were linebackers.

Hero ball is Young's forte. Pretty much all we here about his game.

Hopefully hes more than just a magician who pulls rabbits out of a hat and can work in structure too. I don't want every snap to look like a struggle.

The pro comp for Stroud is Prescott and Goff. Richardson's comp is Wentz. Did anyone commenting read it?

Hmmmmm...... https://www.nbcnews.com/health/mens-health/leg-lengthening-surgery-gains-popularity-men-seeking-taller-rcna79819

This is a respectable report. One guy winning out over another good option is much more comforting than using negatives of one to elevate the other.

No comment. We're on to the next coach.

It's a test for reaction time. Not intelligence. The S2 website states: Do these scores have anything to do with book smarts or intelligence? The S2 Eval measures the same brain systems that athletes engage during play, which are very different than what is measured in the classroom and on standard IQ tests. Decisions in the classroom and on tests of intelligence measure abilities in everyday sorts of thinking skills and when you have minutes or hours to process information and make decisions. Athletes make split-second decisions in sub-second time frames. We have tested incredible athletes who struggle in the academic classroom, but who can see, process, and react with incredible skill on the field. Similarly, just because someone excels in the classroom, those skills don’t always translate to the field. Whether you score high or low on specific skills in the S2 evaluation has very little relationship to academic performance or intelligence.

Have fun. Since it moved from Saturdays and I'm not working around my house I don't even watch on tv. Checking the picks periodically online provides what I need to know form a draft.

The Chiefs.

Yet it's meaningless. I certainly don't follow the team for the attention it does or doesn't get.

Media driven drama for the adult male soap opera. Not worth the time.

Nobody who has watched or analyzed his game thinks that though.

He scored 173 of possible 62 on a world sports cognition test.

I'd probably start with looking at their website if I was really interested in learning about it.

Young would be a great soccer or cricket player.

Now would be a good time to market an Insiders section again.

Thanks to Brock Purdy this thing nobody knew existed until mid February is the end all be all of fan draft analysis.

None of it matters if a person can't physically pass well. As has been stated it's one part of evaluations and it's not just one score

It's not a football test

This one I just don't understand the logic. If he was just cheap I would get it. But he's shown that not to be the case. I won't be surprised if it happens