csx

I'm not a big proponent to taking two receivers high. There is a lot more to a roster than receivers.

Doesn't seem to be worth it

"These guys are roughly the same height weight and speed so obviously they will have the same career" is useless analysis.

Some good drafts will do it

Exactly why it's a bad idea for a rebuild.

Well yes we are trying to strike gold in the second round. That's the only way to build a roster. You have to draft well. There is no way around it Diggs was a 5th rounder by the way.

Seems too much is being made of this.

Cant find that but doesn't take much to come to that conclusion. He went on and on and on about Tremble and Mays to Ellis. Maybe he just tell local shows whatever will fill time. But poor Ellis really rolled with that stuff

Cossel has been terrible. At least regarding our drafts.

Derp "So now I'm 31. I said I'm at the age now where I'm cool going back home; I can handle myself."

Pearsall seems the better bet. Get him a professional hair stylist.

Seem a rather solid draft. These are second rounders remember. Not as high on the Legette part though .

A bit late for that transition.

Remember these are second round picks we are talking about. Seems some are scrutinizing them like top 15 selections.

It went from him having a pretty pass on an otherwise bad game to this. The love fest is the predictable trend where in trying to out moan the previous poster by inflating Corall a little more each post. A year ago he was a joke buy because it can be used to whine the tune had changed. The hyperbole is statement about 1/3 of the playbook. But because it's part of the Huddle group moaning it's not called out as being as absurd as it is. Constant exaggeration

If 1/3 of a playbook is sneak and hail mary you need a new playbook. I get it but this thread is getting a little absurd with the Corall revisionist love fest and hyperbole.

You were all here posting everyday

The verdict on Mingo is far from being in.

He played 8 games. How little do y'all pay attention to not recognize players?

You asked why. The article clearly states why. Not sure what else it could say.

It doesn't allude to it. It straight up says it in first paragraph.

Use this to generate the Twitter link

No idea. It's March

It's funny people don't realize that its something that would have been explicitly configured to consume the panthers.com news feed api. It's not a being. It's a feature of the forum software