Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hayward, Monroe, Love All Options Hornets Look To Explore


Recommended Posts

They’ll explore how to add another game-changer to center Al Jefferson. So I take it for granted they’ll check what it might take to acquire power forward Kevin Love, who seemingly wants out of Minneapolis. Likewise, I’d expect them to inquire about restricted free agents Greg Monroe with Detroit and Gordon Hayward with Utah via sign-and-trades. Charlotte Observer - See more at: http://hoopshype.com/rumors/tag/charlotte_hornets#sthash.tghVRYZE.dpuf

It's gonna be a fun offseason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would a max deal be for Hayward per year? I'm not sold on the fact that he's worth a max deal, but I would totally want to bring him in.

I think it's a 5yr/80mil contract.

Gordon was seeking a 4yr/50mil which the JAZZ declined.

I think that Gordon is worth a max contract, but he would be getting paid much higher than Big Al.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's a 5yr/80mil contract.

Gordon was seeking a 4yr/50mil which the JAZZ declined.

I think that Gordon is worth a max contract, but he would be getting paid much higher than Big Al.

 

I think it would take a 4-55/60 m deal to get him out of Utah without a sign and trade...I don't think Utah would match that type of offer for him....

 

For what it's worth, Utah fans think of him as an average player worth no more then 9-10 million a season max.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would take a 4-55/60 m deal to get him out of Utah without a sign and trade...I don't think Utah would match that type of offer for him....

Agree.

Jazz do have two 1st rounders so they won't feel like they have to keep Gordon.

However, the Kings have already put the no8 pick on the block. They may try to send that pick for a guy like Hayward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hayward no. Can't create his own shot

Hayward is above average with the ball in his hands & has shown the ability to get shots off with guys on him

His shooting percentage is what concerns me more than anything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...