-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
It just highlights that the supposed best attribute about Bryce Young that being his football IQ and elite processing was fools gold from the start. Daniel Jones is not really that much better in that area. But. Like Sam Darnold. Jones has the physical talent in order to compensate for it at times. Though both have faltered like Bryce when the lights are bright too. They can at least put up significant yardage and put the ball places other QB's can't. Bryce does not and never did have that. Every little thing on both sides of the ball have to go perfect for him to be even serviceable. That is why it was such a foolish gamble to make. If you trade up like we did you take the best physical passer or you don't trade up. Even the Giants after giving Jones that contract they are still in a more advantageous position QB wise than we are. Because they weren't stupid enough to give up a haul and a talented WR for a physical outlier at QB. It's all self inflicted. Sigh... -
Let me put it this way, Im not buy any master plans from this crew. The plan still appears to be the other players on offense will carry him. No matter how much they put into the offense that's going to be tough to pull off. If you can't do something good then there is always something stupid to do. That seems like this crew. Insert Evero into why bring back Dalton and it all points to they thought the red flags were false. That's all I got -
It puts so much pressure on the D when you can only score 10 points. You put our D with a high scoring O and they would look like a much better unit, still bad but not historically bad.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.