Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barber: Anderson Attended Production meeting


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

Cam will play. May not start, but he'll play. It'll take 2 bad drives. If Anderson starts and can't move the ball, Cam will be the spark they turn to. Mark it down.

He's either going to start or be inactive. They won't have him suit up but not start the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plan is probably to go with Cam unless he has a setback. However, I cant blame them if they choose to sit Cam this game. Dont want to make injuries worse and increase needed recovery time. The fact it is a division game I think he plays.....after all, "Division games are worth two."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am actually quite suprised how upset people seem to be that Cam might actually miss one game, its almost as though the entire Panther universe will be turned upside down, its only ONE game. People on here act as though hes done for the season.

Im going to be perfectly honest and some on here might not like it, DA gives us our best chance at winning tommorrow period! Why? Well hes healthy, overall he has good timing with the WRs and has more reps with them "(Rivera said this BTW) and he has looked good in pre season and seems to have excellent chemistry with KB.

If you really look at this entire situation through an objective lens, you are blind if you dont think DA gives us our best chance to win tommorrow. Stop ignoring the obvious, how many practices has Cam got with the WRs since the NE game? How many has DA had? Who is healthy? Who is not? DA is healthy.

Its going to be funny tommorrow when DA starts, we win and people on here will be happy that not only did we win but we also gave our franchise QB one game off to be 100% come next Sunday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am actually quite suprised how upset people seem to be that Cam might actually miss one game, its almost as though the entire Panther universe will be turned upside down, its only ONE game. People on here act as though hes done for the season.

Im going to be perfectly honest and some on here might not like it, DA gives us our best chance at winning tommorrow period! Why? Well hes healthy, overall he has good timing with the WRs and has more reps with them "(Rivera said this BTW) and he has looked good in pre season and seems to have excellent chemistry with KB.

If you really look at this entire situation through an objective lens, you are blind if you dont think DA gives us our best chance to win tommorrow. Stop ignoring the obvious, how many practices has Cam got with the WRs since the NE game? How many has DA had? Who is healthy? Who is not? DA is healthy.

Its going to be funny tommorrow when DA starts, we win and people on here will be happy that not only did we win but we also gave our franchise QB one game off to be 100% come next Sunday

i actually think this game might be better designed for anderson to start. stop the run and that's all their offense is. mike evans runs harder from fights he starts in the street than he does on the field and josh/luke mccown should be on the sidelines or in the CFL by this point. the only way tampa wins is if a less than 100% cam takes chances and gets burned. anderson is just gonna move the chains, eat clock, and let the run game set the pace while the D stymies that bottom 5 offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i actually think this game might be better designed for anderson to start. stop the run and that's all their offense is. mike evans runs harder from fights he starts in the street than he does on the field and josh/luke mccown should be on the sidelines or in the CFL by this point. the only way tampa wins is if a less than 100% cam takes chances and gets burned. anderson is just gonna move the chains, eat clock, and let the run game set the pace while the D stymies that bottom 5 offense

Right, people act as though a backup QB has never won a game before. Would I want DA for a entire season? Ofcourse not, but at this point in time and given the current situation at this moment, DA gives us the best chance to win just for tommorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im going to be perfectly honest and some on here might not like it, DA gives us our best chance at winning tommorrow period! Why? Well hes healthy, overall he has good timing with the WRs and has more reps with them "(Rivera said this BTW) and he has looked good in pre season and seems to have excellent chemistry with KB.

If you really look at this entire situation through an objective lens, you are blind if you dont think DA gives us our best chance to win tommorrow. Stop ignoring the obvious, how many practices has Cam got with the WRs since the NE game? How many has DA had? Who is healthy? Who is not? DA is healthy.

 

 

Then count me in with the blind people.

 

DA does not give us our best chance to win. He's a backup. He's a backup on probably 28 to 30 teams in the NFL. On the other hand, the guy you want him to replace is a top ten QB. Let's also not ignore the fact that DA is coming off his own injury, one to the hand he throws the ball with.

 

DA may start, but don't try to convince anyone that he gives us our best chance to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, call me crazy, but with how the Bucs are practicing by dressing Glennon in a Newton jersey and how Mccoy said hes looking forward to hitting Newton, I personally think it will take some of the wind out of their sails (no pun intended) that DA is starting and may not be as motivated to play as hard as they would if Cam was playing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then count me in with the blind people.

DA does not give us our best chance to win. He's a backup. He's a backup on probably 28 to 30 teams in the NFL. On the other hand, the guy you want him to replace is a top ten QB. Let's also not ignore the fact that DA is coming off his own injury, one to the hand he throws the ball with.

DA may start, but don't try to convince anyone that he gives us our best chance to win.

Did you not see how awful Rodgers looked against Seattle? Yes, grant it its Seattle at Seattle, but there is no doubt Rodgers looked rusty as fug due to injury and that was even with WRs that he has worked with for years.

Mark my words, Cam would look worse than Rodgers did if he plays in this current situation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...