Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 WR Tracker (old vs new)


lindseyj14

Recommended Posts

Week 1

Old- 24 Targets, 9 Rec, 147 Yd, 1 Td

New- 13 Targets, 11 Rec, 124 Yd, 1 Td

Week 2

Old- 10 Targets, 6 Rec, 71 Yd

New- 19 Targets, 11 Rec, 146 Yd, 1 Td

2014 Totals

Old- 34 Targets, 15 Rec, 218 Yd, 1 Td

New- 32 Targets, 22 Rec, 270 Yd, 2 Td

Smith Sr- 25 Targets, 13 Rec, 189 Yd, 1 Td

LaFell- 6 Targets

Ginn Jr- 3 Targets, 2 Rec, 29 Yd

Benjamin- 16 Targets, 8 Rec, 138 Yd, 1 Td

Cotchery- 8 Targets, 8 Rec, 78 Yd

Avant- 8 Targets, 6 Rec, 54 Yd, 1 Td

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're a deep threat receiver away from having a nasty WR group, it's why I think losing Ginn was actually a bigger loss to the offense than Smith, we have nobody to replace that deep threat he had, even if he wasn't the best catcher, he always kept the defense guessing. If we can get Hill into shape then that could well be the answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn has a return TD that factors in.

  

He also has an annual $3.3mil salary that factors in. Neither are relevant to WR production, though.

Ginn had a TD, but also I don't get the point of this. These guys aren't Panther's anymore, let it go. Not to mention I think LaFell and Ginn are like 4th/5th on the depth chart on their new teams.

LaFell & Ginn are being paid 2nd/3rd option money by their teams. They're 4th/5th option in production because the suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ginn had a TD, but also I don't get the point of this. These guys aren't Panther's anymore, let it go. Not to mention I think LaFell and Ginn are like 4th/5th on the depth chart on their new teams.

 

Letting it go is exactly what all the whiners who said our WRs would be worse would love for us to do. We're expected to shut up and take it when they dish it out, then let it go when they're proven wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  

He also has an annual $3.3mil salary that factors in. Neither are relevant to WR production, though.

LaFell & Ginn are being paid 2nd/3rd option money by their teams. They're 4th/5th option in production because the suck.

 

It is relevant to comparing new WRs to old WRs because Ginn as a WR also contributed immensely to the return game. Philly has been solid so far, but losing Ginn in the return game was more than a minor loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is relevant to comparing new WRs to old WRs because Ginn as a WR also contributed immensely to the return game. Philly has been solid so far, but losing Ginn in the return game was more than a minor loss.

You wanna pay Ginn $3.3mil to return punts & drop passes?

He wasn't even that great as a returner last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Letting it go is exactly what all the whiners who said our WRs would be worse would love for us to do. We're expected to shut up and take it when they dish it out, then let it go when they're proven wrong.

 

Well then maybe the OP should mentioned Steve Smith, which is really what everyone has been clamoring about since the offseason. He should probably also mention Benjamin's drops today which I've read over and over was Smith's biggest knock. I know some of my friends, and myself, really wanted to keep Ginn as well, but Smith was really the only offseason loss that I've had conversations about. LaFell was expected to be cut from what we saw last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You wanna pay Ginn $3.3mil to return punts & drop passes?

He wasn't even that great as a returner last year.

 

He was a better returner than I've seen in a Panther uniform in about half a decade, but besides that I keep seeing you mentioning drops. I'd really like to see statistics, at their depth, of drops league wide compared to Ginn and Smith. LaFell I think everyone in Panther nation agreed was a goner by week 14 last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
    • I would care more if said reporter was my queen Kay Adams
×
×
  • Create New...