Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thank you David Glenn for your take on 89


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Darin Gantt basically said that everyone who knew Smith should not be surprised by Smith having a great game and burning bridges.  He said that Smith shouldn't have taken things so personally, but that Gettleman should have handled the situation better as well.

 

He specifically said that people are always throwing the Jerry Rice and Joe Montana argument around, but he basically said that it's apples and oranges because those guys were notified privately and had time to make the transition within their minds, whereas Smith didn't.

 

Both Gantt and Glenn basically said that it was OK to move on from Smith, but that Gettleman should have handled the situation befitting of the franchise legend that Smitty was (is).  

 

That's what I and others had been saying all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No he didnt

 

Oh yes he did (and is).  He says generally that he'd rather deal with a dude like Steve Smith that may be an ass sometimes, but keeps it real, than someone who says all the right things then sneaks behind your back and does the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill Voth's take on Mac Attack was more informed.

 

The podcast can be found here (link)

 

Here's a synopsis...

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

- Said first that Smith is not the "innocent little angel" that he claims to be.

 

- When asked by McClain if the Panthers botched their handling of Smith, Voth said "no" and explained why.

 

- Per Voth, Smith was in Gettleman's office all of last year being told to cool down, act professional, ease up on teammates, etc.

 

- Smith's response was "Do you know who I am?  I do what I want".

 

- Then suddenly he's cut, and acting hurt like "What did I do wrong?"

 

- Says that there was indeed a meeting with Gettleman where he was told he would be cut, and that immediately after he went to Jerry Richardson's house.

 

- Voth added his own belief that Kelvin Benjamin wouldn't be as good as he is now if Smith were still around.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Basically, Voth believes Smith thought Jerry Richardson would back him like he had before (like the story with Jeff Davidson).  When Richardson didn't overrule Gettleman, he was left dumbstruck.  But because he still believes he's more important than Gettleman and Rivera, he's only burning bridges with them and not Richardson.

 

Essentially, Smith is the spoiled kid that Daddy has always protected from the consequences of his actions.  Then suddenly Daddy tells him to face the music and he acts like a whiny brat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes he did (and is).  He says generally that he'd rather deal with a dude like Steve Smith that may be an ass sometimes, but keeps it real, than someone who says all the right things then sneaks behind your back and does the opposite.

 

I am saying he didn't deserve better than he got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill Voth's take on Mac Attack was more informed.

 

The podcast can be found here (link)

 

Here's a synopsis...

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

- Said first that Smith is not the "innocent little angel" that he claims to be.

 

- When asked by McClain if the Panthers botched their handling of Smith, Voth said "no" and explained why.

 

- Per Voth, Smith was in Gettleman's office all of last year being told to cool down, act professional, ease up on teammates, etc.

 

- Smith's response was "Do you know who I am?  I do what I want".

 

- Then suddenly he's cut, and acting hurt like "What did I do wrong?"

 

- Says that there was indeed a meeting with Gettleman where he was told he would be cut, and that immediately after he went to Jerry Richardson's house.

 

- Voth added his own belief that Kelvin Benjamin wouldn't be as good as he is now if Smith were still around.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Basically, Voth believes Smith thought Jerry Richardson would back him like he had before.  When Richardson didn't overrule Gettleman, he was left dumbstruck.  But because he still believes he's more important than Gettleman and Rivera, he's only burning bridges with them and not Richardson.

 

Essentially, Smith is the spoiled kid that Daddy has always protected from the consequences of his actions.  Then suddenly Daddy tells him to face the music and he acts like a whiny brat.

 

 

Voth or Glenn (who I like but has no real info on this outside of what is reported) and Gantt who is... well Gantt.  Not the best source.

 

I will take Voth all day

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darin Gantt basically said that everyone who knew Smith should not be surprised by Smith having a great game and burning bridges.  He said that Smith shouldn't have taken things so personally, but that Gettleman should have handled the situation better as well.

 

He specifically said that people are always throwing the Jerry Rice and Joe Montana argument around, but he basically said that it's apples and oranges because those guys were notified privately and had time to make the transition within their minds, whereas Smith didn't.

 

Both Gantt and Glenn basically said that it was OK to move on from Smith, but that Gettleman should have handled the situation befitting of the franchise legend that Smitty was (is).  

 

That's what I and others had been saying all along.

 

 

Hate it that I agree with Gantt, but I do as well.

 

Gman did not handle it well... Smitty took it poorly (and personally) and is pissed.

 

 

I understand why he was cut and although I didn't 100% agree with it, it's done and time to move on.  I wish Smitty could but apparently he's not ready to yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had a private meeting with Gettleman.  Gettleman informed him that he would try to trade him and if not he would release him.  Then Smith had lunch with Big Cat the day before he was released so that Richardson could thank him.

 

All this while the Panthers were denying rumors or no commenting rumors flying all over the press.

 

So.... how did Smith not have time?  That is utter bullshit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Jerry Richardson as an owner, but I gotta say he made one huge mistake.

 

Treating a player like he's untouchable undermines your leadership and makes it tougher for them to do their jobs.  To his credit, he finally wised up, but it would have been better had he not created the situation in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever. Voth's opinion is not really addressing the issue at hand.  Smith should have been notified privately before he was cut.  Any mature and business-minded person should be able to see that.   If you're running a first-rate organization, that's what you do: act professionally, even when you believe that others have not.  As a GM, you are held to a much higher standard.   Anyone with any sense of professional protocol should be able to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had a private meeting with Gettleman.  Gettleman informed him that he would try to trade him and if not he would release him.  Then Smith had lunch with Big Cat the day before he was released so that Richardson could thank him.

 

All this while the Panthers were denying rumors or no commenting rumors flying all over the press.

 

So.... how did Smith not have time?  That is utter bullshit

 

 

I agree that there is a lot we don't know and I think Smitty is being infantile by doing what he's doing.  He'd be much smarter to chill and let it settle down, play ball, and come back here when he's done to welcoming arms to retire.  He apparently doesn't want to do that, and It doesn't surprise me given his personality.

 

I stand by what I said though, Gettleman could have handled it better than he did, both with Smitty directly and most especially with the fans.  He could have come out and explained what went down, but as usual, they chose to remain silent and take the heat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had a private meeting with Gettleman.  Gettleman informed him that he would try to trade him and if not he would release him.  Then Smith had lunch with Big Cat the day before he was released so that Richardson could thank him.

 

All this while the Panthers were denying rumors or no commenting rumors flying all over the press.

 

So.... how did Smith not have time?  That is utter bullshit

 

This was way past the time that Smith should have been notified that a change was coming.  Come on, dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...