Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jamie Dukes gets it


ThinkAboutIt

Recommended Posts

There's no way they could have predicted that. Asking them to see that coming isn't any different than asking them to foresee Greg Hardy's issues. You can say 'the signs were there' but that's pure hindsight. It's not realistic to suggest they could have predicted these things.

Also worth remembering they did go after Anthony Collins in free agency but he signed with Tampa instead. After that, tackle salaries started getting ridiculous and it's pretty clear now that most of the big signings were wildly overpaid.

And again, intent vs execution.

I knew it was happening and even said as much right after the contract was accepted. All the writing was on the wall, no way you take that deal unless you're planning on retiring after the season or want out from that team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody with any sense knows that the notion of an NFL GM deliberately sabotaging his own quarterback is too goofy for words.

 

 

I am not a bit suprised that a select few on the Huddle are that dumb. It's hard for me to play the blame game directed at the GM,when it was a well known fact we were in salary cap hell and would have to bite the bullet until the problem was resolved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a bit suprised that a select few on the Huddle are that dumb. It's hard for me to play the blame game directed at the GM,when it was a well known fact we were in salary cap hell and would have to bite the bullet until the problem was resolved.

 

Leave your facts out of this, please :unsure:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is the dumbest poo I have ever heard. Why even go through all that trouble when he could trade cam for 1st round picks?

 

Quite true :lol:

 

If Gettleman didn't like him, he's the GM so he could just trade him.  And it would actually be easier now while he's still under his rookie deal.

 

"But that would be unpopular" you say?  Perhaps you've heard of this guy named Steve Smith.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jones reported their offer was not much different than ours. He just chose them.

It was later in free agency that the contracts got ridiculous.

Correct, but when your going against a team in Florida..... You've got to up the ante, because of tax laws. A similar deal for the player in NC to Florida would be like 40/5 here to the 30/5 he ended up getting. Hence why I called it a short change offer.

He wasn't worth it though, not even the 30/5 he got from the Bucs. Cincinnati had a stout line last season, just made him look better then he really is. He's been pretty bad from what I've seen in Tampa.

All I'm saying is, if you end up with two starting OT's who are UDFA, then you didn't plan well enough or you had way too much faith in a product you shouldn't have, it should have never got to the point that they are relying on UDFA at tackle when your supposed to be a power run, play action team with read option thrown in. All those things require a really stout line at the POA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct, but when your going against a team in Florida..... You've got to up the ante, because of tax laws. A similar deal for the player in NC to Florida would be like 40/5 here to the 30/5 he ended up getting. Hence why I called it a short change offer.

He wasn't worth it though, not even the 30/5 he got from the Bucs. Cincinnati had a stout line last season, just made him look better then he really is. He's been pretty bad from what I've seen in Tampa.

All I'm saying is, if you end up with two starting OT's who are UDFA, then you didn't plan well enough or you had way too much faith in a product you shouldn't have, it should have never got to the point that they are relying on UDFA at tackle when your supposed to be a power run, play action team with read option thrown in. All those things require a really stout line at the POA.

 

I still believe this was not the plan going into the offseason, and there's a fair amount of evidence to support that.

 

It was, however, what ended up being the choice, and it was a lousy one.

 

But it was not sabotage.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite true :lol:

If Gettleman didn't like him, he's the GM so he could just trade him. And it would actually be easier now while he's still under his rookie deal.

"But that would be unpopular" you say? Perhaps you've heard of this guy named Steve Smith.

I'm on the side that Smith being cut was because of Cam, not against him. However I still believe that the team going 12-4 last season surprised the hell out of gettleman. I think he was expecting to go into this season with a new coaching staff and Cam being on a prove me year.....it just happened a season or two earlier then expected. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still believe this was not the plan going into the offseason, and there's a fair amount of evidence to support that.

It was, however, what ended up being the choice, and it was a lousy one.

But it was not sabotage.

No it wasn't sabotage in any way, I've explained what I think happened. I think it was purely cap hell + bad planning = shitty oline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm on the side that Smith being cut was because of Cam, not against him. However I still believe that the team going 12-4 last season surprised the hell out of gettleman. I think he was expecting to go into this season with a new coaching staff and Cam being on a prove me year.....it just happened a season or two earlier then expected. Lol

 

Agree about Smith and 12-4 being a shock.

 

Coaching staff?  Don't know but it's possible.

 

If you were to ask me the biggest factors screwing us this year, I'd say the salary cap and Greg Hardy's immaturity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree about Smith and 12-4 being a shock.

Coaching staff? Don't know but it's possible.

If you were to ask me the biggest factors screwing us this year, I'd say the salary cap and Greg Hardy's immaturity.

Greg Hardy, so stupid. He was literally on the verge of a 70-80 million deal and I doubt he sees even half of that now, maybe not even a quarter of it. Even though his next contract is going to have hard line personal conduct outs for the team if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg Hardy, so stupid. He was literally on the verge of a 70-80 million deal and I doubt he sees even half of that now, maybe not even a quarter of it. Even though his next contract is going to have hard line personal conduct outs for the team if possible.

 

Assuming he's found innocent.

 

He probably will be, but I don't consider that a lock.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...