Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teal over Godfrey?


SCpanther

Recommended Posts

I think it should be an open competition. But I doubt it will be. Godfrey wasn't impressive last year. Last night, he again appeared to be the weakest of a weak bunch. Godfrey seems more like a CB than a S....maybe Fox made in error there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be completely honest with you, when I made the Cherry thread, Teal came in my mind and I forgot about him

Me personally, I definitely liked what I saw. He has speed and instincts. I liked the pick, and the blitz. Good thread, definitely would like to know what others thought too

I'm iffy on Godfrey, I haven't seen much from him. Haven't heard much about him in camp either. Not a good sign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big Teal fan that doesnt understand why people say he sucks and should be cut, but I don't think we should go that far yet. Godfrey was pretty darn good early on last year. He defintly helped win that Cardinal game last year on that special team save.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps you guys are right. Every offseason, some players take steps back while others take steps forward. But I have to think Fox gives Godfrey at least another year to really learn the position.

With little pressure from the defensive line as a whole, it's tough to really envision who is going to step up in the secondary. Teal was about the only bright spot of the bunch last night, and that's saying something when Harris and Gamble are out there. I didn't get to watch the game as closely as I wanted due to a family issue: was Godfrey with the ones? Did he play more than a few series?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yards a game works better over a longer period of time as well. Averages always work out over the long run. The smaller the sample size the easier it is to skew. Also opponents matter more when the size is small. Player 1 lights up 2 bad defenses in 4 starts vs Player 2 playing 10 games vs multiple defenses. It hard to make it apples to apples how it currently sits. Remember during Bryce’s little run last year how annoyed you were when people were pulling Bryce’s starts from week 9 on vs the whole season. 
    • Someone else claimed I said EVERY.  Literally in my post breaking it down it gave Bryce TDs per game.   Shough however has the majority in his favor if just looking at starts. whats subjective about comp %, yards, QB ratings and turnovers?  Now I guess the argument one might make off them could be subjective.  But all I’m saying is statistically as a starter he has been better this year overall.  I don’t think Shough is great.  I think he is impressive based on the situation.  2nd rounder stepping in on a bad team.   And he like so many other QBs…..serves as little red flag going off about what we are doing here offensively. 
    • Player A - 2 starts.  200 yards in each start. He averages 200 yards a game.  Player B - 1 start.  Throws for 400 yards.  Comes in another random game and has 1 pass attempt on a Hail Mary to end the game that goes incomplete.   Now given the random game he appeared for a snap, he averages 200 yards a game. Thats why you isolate starts. If you are talking starter vs someone who began as a backup.  Simple made up numbers/situations to illustrate the point. 
×
×
  • Create New...