Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teal over Godfrey?


SCpanther

Recommended Posts

I think it should be an open competition. But I doubt it will be. Godfrey wasn't impressive last year. Last night, he again appeared to be the weakest of a weak bunch. Godfrey seems more like a CB than a S....maybe Fox made in error there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be completely honest with you, when I made the Cherry thread, Teal came in my mind and I forgot about him

Me personally, I definitely liked what I saw. He has speed and instincts. I liked the pick, and the blitz. Good thread, definitely would like to know what others thought too

I'm iffy on Godfrey, I haven't seen much from him. Haven't heard much about him in camp either. Not a good sign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big Teal fan that doesnt understand why people say he sucks and should be cut, but I don't think we should go that far yet. Godfrey was pretty darn good early on last year. He defintly helped win that Cardinal game last year on that special team save.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps you guys are right. Every offseason, some players take steps back while others take steps forward. But I have to think Fox gives Godfrey at least another year to really learn the position.

With little pressure from the defensive line as a whole, it's tough to really envision who is going to step up in the secondary. Teal was about the only bright spot of the bunch last night, and that's saying something when Harris and Gamble are out there. I didn't get to watch the game as closely as I wanted due to a family issue: was Godfrey with the ones? Did he play more than a few series?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Having trouble finding all these articles saying the Raiders withheld information. Here’s the latest from Crosby’s surgeon: ElAttrache told ESPN's Adam Schefter on Wednesday morning that Crosby was "doing very well in the early part of his rehab and recovery from surgery to treat a significant meniscus tear and the related stress injury to the bone and cartilage in his knee. He is certainly on track in his planned program." "We truly respect the work of the Ravens' staff with Maxx regarding the contract physical exam. We also understand the challenge the staff faces when tasked to provide a future risk assessment based on an evaluation early in the recovery process," ElAttrache said. "This is especially challenging when dealing with an elite player like Maxx considering the level of commitment necessary for a team to obtain him. The timing of this assessment is unfortunate because the apparent risk will lessen as his recovery progresses and his return to performance over the next few months becomes clear."     So the Ravens excuse is the future risk assessment based on the physical, not that the Raiders withheld information. They found an excuse to save face publicly. They had the right to cancel the trade for no reason at all, but they’re trying to save face with the most acceptable reasoning they can find. I’ve heard and seen the Ravens getting dragged everywhere for this. You know what would be an easy way to put a stop to that if you’re the Ravens and the Raiders were actually the shady ones withholding information? Just come out and say that you were not given all the medical information. But they aren’t saying that. I guess they’re just taking the bullet for the Raiders just because?    Speculation indeed.
    • Two first round picks for a guy with very questionable knees who will be 29 this summer. Yes it is safe to say the Ravens got cold feet.
    • The salary cap is the reason we got Phillips and Lloyd 
×
×
  • Create New...