Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Seattle Should've Had to play Green Bay in Green Bay


PanthersClinic

Recommended Posts

Week 1 Seattle played Green Bay in Seattle and won easily.  So that's why they're the #1 seed.

 

But the Broncos had to play New England in New England - second year in a row by the way - and that's why they're a #2 seed.

 

The NFC teams SEA played at home are 49ers, Cards, Rams, Cowboys,and Giants. Then they also got the Raiders and Chargers at home.

 

I guess there is a system that arranges all this but SEA got a pretty good deal on who they played and who they played on the road. Just my opinion.You would think they would arrange it to make it more difficult to repeat like they did for Denver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Week 1 Seattle played Green Bay in Seattle and won easily.  So that's why they're the #1 seed.

 

But the Broncos had to play New England in New England - second year in a row by the way - and that's why they're a #2 seed.

 

The NFC teams SEA played at home are 49ers, Cards, Rams, Cowboys,and Giants. Then they also got the Raiders and Chargers at home.

 

I guess there is a system that arranges all this but SEA got a pretty good deal on who they played and who they played on the road. Just my opinion.You would think they would arrange it to make it more difficult to repeat like they did for Denver.

 

14 of 16 opponents are know for each season looking forward as well as home and aways..........

 

just don't know the dates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why would we not be contenders? As long as Bryce plays like he did when he came back, we absolutely can be contenders...that is...   if the defense plays better... which is why adding someone like Ramsey when we have a QB on a rookie deal and can afford it makes sense IMO. No one thought of the Commanders being contenders last year or the Texans the year before and so on and so forth. Top-end QB play, especially for a guy on a rookie deal, changes everything in terms of timelines. Regardless of what this board thinks, I hope the front office is willing to he aggressive in thks window we currently have with a rookie QB deal  
    • Would absolutely love to have him. I dont think he would require more than a 5th rounder. The biggest thing with his contract is the amount of guaranteed money. As long as they can work out and scenario where the Panthers aren't on the hook for a lot of that, I think it's a no-brainer. The Panthers can come up with $20M at the drop of a hat with restructuring Moton's contract, so there definitely isn't an issue from a money perspective. Jaycee paired with Ramsey along with Mike Jack would give us one of the best CB groups in the league. The one caveat I see is that safety still remains our biggest current weakness. We need a starting caliber S more than CB, simply put. But adding someone like Ramsey would be amazing as long as the compensation made sense. Ramsey could also play for FS snaps also. I also dont understand this nonsense about being seasons away. We have a QB on a rookie deal who was playing at an elite level to end last season. Within reason, now is absolutely the time to make moves like trading for Ramsey.
    • He'd be a huge upgrade for this year, but we're still not going to be contenders with him and I'd rather keep the cap space to roll into next season to spend on a younger player who can be an impact starter for us for the next 3-5 years while we're hoping to contend.
×
×
  • Create New...