Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Well, I guess it's true what they say about the NL...


shinner

Recommended Posts

Smoltz in his first start with the Cards:

5.0 innings

3 hits

9 strikeouts (7 in a row)

0.00 era

He never approached this kind of outing pitching for Boston....hell, he didn't come close to this pitching against the Nationals!

Sure looks like the opinion that it's easier to pitch in the NL is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smoltz in his first start with the Cards:

5.0 innings

3 hits

9 strikeouts (7 in a row)

0.00 era

He never approached this kind of outing pitching for Boston....hell, he didn't come close to this pitching against the Nationals!

Sure looks like the opinion that it's easier to pitch in the NL is true.

Someone seems bitter...............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone seems bitter...............

duh...what's not to be bitter about? I was a big fan of his but now I desperately want to see him crash and burn. If he went to STL to be a starter I'd not be as annoyed but the jagoff accepted that he'd go to their pen....something he outright refused to do in Boston. Yeah, that annoys me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

duh...what's not to be bitter about? I was a big fan of his but now I desperately want to see him crash and burn. If he went to STL to be a starter I'd not be as annoyed but the jagoff accepted that he'd go to their pen....something he outright refused to do in Boston. Yeah, that annoys me.

Accepted after he was humiliated and essentially cut in Boston. Big difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accepted after he was humiliated and essentially cut in Boston. Big difference.

He had nothing bad to say about his treatment by the GM or the organization. The only thing humiliating about his stay in Boston was the way he pitched (which he basically, acknowledged)....and he wasn't essentially cut. He was asked to restructure his bloated contract and pitch from the pen....but apparently he's too good for that. AND, if Boston wasn't responsible for most of his contract he might not have found a job in the NL either. Boston signed him for way too much, no argument there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had nothing bad to say about his treatment by the GM or the organization. The only thing humiliating about his stay in Boston was the way he pitched (which he basically, acknowledged)....and he wasn't essentially cut. He was asked to restructure his bloated contract and pitch from the pen....but apparently he's too good for that. AND, if Boston wasn't responsible for most of his contract he might not have found a job in the NL either. Boston signed him for way too much, no argument there.

Reminds one of Manny last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds one of Manny last year.

Except that Manny forced his way out via quitting on the team, attacking an old man and faking injuries. other than that, yeah...exactly the same :rolleyes:

Oh, I almost forgot....and badmouthing the organization every time there was a mic stuck in his face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well actually I was referencing your reaction. :rolleyes:

:smilewinkgrin:

What can I say, I'm a team guy....team comes first and I really don't appreciate those who put themselves above the team. Same reason I can't stand any of the showboaters in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...