Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3rd preseason game ahead...


Zod

Recommended Posts

If you are going to start making predictions based on the preseason, the third game is the cat's meow. Starters will stay in maybe up until halftime, some game planning gets done in the film room.

Good news is Baltimore will have the same mentality on Saturday, and we will get to see what the Panthers can really do against a decent team.

Soo....prediction time.

Do the Panthers come out swinging and look like a post season team, or do they continue on the vanilla road of preseason no mans land?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I will have to go with the latter. The only player that has looked to be in postseason form thus far has been DeAngelo. I expect to see improvement from last game offensively, but not on the defensive side of the ball. But I'd like to see what our Offense does against a good defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My prediction: Nick Hayden helps hold down the line (seriously? about time) and we give up less than 100 yards rushing.

E Brown gets a sack and possibly Peppers too.

Quiet night from our running game probably no rushing TDs.

One of our backup receivers will catch a TD pass.

The starting secondary will blow a coverage and give up a long TD pass.

Score: 17 - 13 Ravens Win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this next pre-season game will look all that much different than the first two other than the fact that the starters will play more. I do think that the first regular season game will look a lot different, they'll turn it up for that.

My fear is that the injury bug is trying to make up for the lack of them last season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our offense gets in gear and goes all tutti-fruity on them. The defense, however, stays in the simple packages and nothing more than fundamentals are stressed. In that, expect better tackling, but little else.

The Ravens offense won't do anything fancy, so neither will we. A vanilla package is all we need to evaluate our folks, and that will probably continue until the Eagles game. Their defense is good enough that we'll want to test some of our real stuff against it though.

Panthers will win this one, just because it's a home game. I'm calling that based on thin air though, I really have nothing more than wishful thinking to justify it.

I'm looking forward to the game tonight, to see how the Ravens look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is talking about how the Falcons 1st team has looked strong this preaseason. Please remember they have gone 1-1 against the likes of the Lions and the Rams....combined 3 wins last year.

Fox believes in testing his team in the preseason. We are playing 4 playoff teams in the Giants, Dolphins, Ravens, and Steelers. Playing the likes of these teams identifies areas of weakness so they can be addressed.

Playing the likes of the Lions and Rams do nothing more than pad stats for meaningless games.

Not saying the Falcons are not and will not be a good team this year. However, comparing performances agains the Lions/Rams to the Giants/Dolphins is absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is talking about how the Falcons 1st team has looked strong this preaseason. Please remember they have gone 1-1 against the likes of the Lions and the Rams....combined 3 wins last year.

Fox believes in testing his team in the preseason. We are playing 4 playoff teams in the Giants, Dolphins, Ravens, and Steelers. Playing the likes of these teams identifies areas of weakness so they can be addressed.

Playing the likes of the Lions and Rams do nothing more than pad stats for meaningless games.

Not saying the Falcons are not and will not be a good team this year. However, comparing performances agains the Lions/Rams to the Giants/Dolphins is absurd.

I agree that comparing performances is not the way it should be with the teams the Falcons have played. But our first team guys have looked less than average against the first team guys we have played. Who wins preseason games means nothing really. I more look for how the first team guys played, and if we aren't doing well against playoff caliber teams, that doesn't bode well for our season and the tough schedule we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I even disagree on the defense. We WILL bring a starting calibre DT into the fold soon. We will also see alot of different things on D during the regular season.

I was talking to Dan Morgan about the defenses performance in the first two games last week. He said to remember this:

1. Our guys are learning a new system

2. We have about 3 vanilla plays that are being run

3. We are using these games to take a long look at alot of backup players

He agrees that the defense you see on Sept 13 will not resemble anything you have seen in these first two games.

Maybe this is just optimism, but he does understand more about what Meeks is doing than any of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol wut?  Stats dont matter now?  Got it
    • So.... you're admitting he's never going to be the type of QB who can drag his team to victories on a consistent basis? Because in today's NFL, the teams that are constant contenders have QB's who can put up those kind of games will their team to wins when needed. If Bryce was anything near as amazing last year as the Bryce defenders try to insinuate he was, we'd either have won more games or his stats would have been better, if not both. Yes, he showed significant improvement over the last 2 months of the season.  Yes, he had a few clutch  moments/throws/drives in that span too. BUT... It's also very much a true statement that on the whole, he was still AT BEST an average QB during that time period.   And for a QB who was touted as being a PG who can get wins without elite talent around him because of how he sees the game, that's just not good enough, sorry. And none of that is to say he can't do that this year, especially after we gave him a weapon like T-Mac and hopefully an improved XL and Coker.  But stop trying to say he was this amazing QB to end the year who has proven he can (and should) be considered a long term solution as a franchise QB, as it's just not true.
    • In what way is that remotely the same thing as I'm saying here? First things first, comparing QB's to any other position is just asinine to begin with.   Second, you're trying to imply the exact opposite of what I'm saying here, so it just doesn't make sense. I'm saying if you remove the players that teams haven't committed to as their long term QB solutions yet, Bryce is the last player ranked in this set of rankings, that's all.  But sure, go ahead and try to make some weird convoluted equivalent for my love of T-Mac (who btw, you'd probably only need to take away 12-15 WRs for me to rank T-Mac #1 in a dynasty format, just sayin, lol)
×
×
  • Create New...