Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive Tackle Options Revisited


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

yeah, I'm sure Stewart is real tempting too.......he was always hurt at Oregon, was banged up last year, and can't get on the field right now.

Yeah who would want a guy with 10 tds as a #2 back last year for a guy that doesn't fit your scheme. Silly rabbit Trix are for kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah who would want a guy with 10 tds as a #2 back last year for a guy that doesn't fit your scheme. Silly rabbit Trix are for kids.

Stewart is productive.....but his injuries are a concern. We couldn't get his real value right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct. Changing or recently changed (I think the Browns did it last year).

There's talk of the Jaguars doing it after hiring Mel Tucker as their DC (he's a 3-4 guy) but I don't know that there's been an official statement yet. From what I've read, they might just use some 3-4 looks but stick with a base 4-3.

If they go heavy that way, Derek Landri could be an odd man out.

If Marty Hurney gets spotted at a Jags game this week... :sosp:

3 of the 4 have a QB up for grabs, too. Just sayin'

Maybe hes knocking out two positions of need with one stone. The more I hear about Williams the more I want him in a Panthers uniform. He is my favorite by far option at DT that I have heard because of one thing he has shown that he can play DT in a 4-3. He tore it up with the packers getting into the backfield early and often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stewart is productive.....but his injuries are a concern. We couldn't get his real value right now.

We are talking about Dorsey. He didn't play all that great in the D scheme that he was supposed to be built for in the 4-3. Now they have switched to the 3-4 which he is not suited to play in. I think Stewart still has more value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are talking about Dorsey. He didn't play all that great in the D scheme that he was supposed to be built for in the 4-3. Now they have switched to the 3-4 which he is not suited to play in. I think Stewart still has more value.

well, it would be an easy arguement against Stewart considering how long he has been banged up. I think Stewart has amazing potential and value.....I'm just pretending to be another team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, it would be an easy arguement against Stewart considering how long he has been banged up. I think Stewart has amazing potential and value.....I'm just pretending to be another team.

If your the other team you can keep him I don't even want him that much. Even without the Signing Bonus he still has a huge salary. For his lack of production and his trade price I would much rather have Stewart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gantt believes it'll be done by week one, but having it take longer is a legit possibility.

I at least hope our FO will sign a huge block absorber for vet min and have the contract with no guaranteed money so we can cut him if someone better is an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the cap/or lack of cap space available, we may have no choice then to dance with who who brought us, if the collective unit of dt's can produce half of what Kemo did, we could be ok, it won't be pretty, there'll probably be some WTF's but it's better to let them learn by being thrown into the fire than holding out for a stop gap jmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the cap/or lack of cap space available, we may have no choice then to dance with who who brought us, if the collective unit of dt's can produce half of what Kemo did, we could be ok, it won't be pretty, there'll probably be some WTF's but it's better to let them learn by being thrown into the fire than holding out for a stop gap jmo

We cut Mccown we have enough space for almost anyone in FA now or a mid-level cut. Add Salley to that list we may have enough for just about anyone that will be cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...