Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Drops Lawsuit Against Mecklenburg County District Attorney's Office

Mr Mojo Risin

By Mr Mojo Risin,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

I'm gonna guess you didn't even read the blurb....

 

The NFL dropped the lawsuit against the DA, because the DA agreed to cooperate and share photos with the NFL so they could determine whether or not a further suspension is warranted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Jesus you people cry and nitpick over everything so I forgot to put Hardy and the DA. The link includes Hardys name as well in the topic

 

The headline...

 

NFL Drops Lawsuit Over Greg Hardy DV Evidence

 

The text...

 

The NFL has dropped its lawsuit against the Mecklenburg County District Attorney's Office.  The league sued to get access to evidence in the Greg Hardy domestic violence case.  WCCB Charlotte first told you last week that both sides worked out a deal.

 

As part of the deal, the DA's office let the league look at seven photos used as evidence in Hardy's bench trial.  The NFL sued to get access to the photos, which show injuries to the former Panther's ex-girlfriend, Nicole Holder.

 

The NFL is trying to determine whether to punish Hardy for violating its personal conduct policy.

 

The suit was against the DA's office over the Hardy evidence.  Hardy himself was not involved in the action.

 

You are correct that he could still be suspended.  It could be argued that their obtaining these pictures makes that more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NAS
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By NAS · Posted

      He had games where he was a top 10 QB that week, vs Saints, Falcons, Eagles, Chiefs, Bucs.  Amazing performances that I think show what he can do consistently.  
    • frankw
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By frankw · Posted

      We both know there's more that goes into batted passes than just the height of the QB. Most people here have readily acknowledged this and there were numerous discussions about it before we drafted Young. But if you are presenting a POV that Bryce's height hasn't tied to issues with his footwork then there's nothing anyone is going to be able to say to sway you and you know this. Even beyond the footwork I recall a redzone play where Bryce couldn't see around his right tackle at all where a receiver was waiting practically alone in the end zone for a touchdown. There are real world circumstances that are going to show up over the course of the upcoming season and it's up to Bryce and Dave Canales to make adjustments and do anything they can to mitigate negative instances and yes that begins with Bryce's footwork again. Thanks for your time. Have a nice weekend.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
×
×
  • Create New...