Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trades


PntherPryd

Recommended Posts

Trades are a great part of Fantasy Football but everybody needs to know the rules and how trades operate.

You can submit a trade offer to anyone in your conference by going to "For Owners" then "Trades". Before submitting please thoroughly research and avoid wasting other owner's time. Once a trade is accepted, Here are the official rules;

Trades Setup

When An Owner Accepts A Trade: The trade is subject to a league-wide vote for 2 days.

Display Trade Comments To All Owners? Yes

Allow Trades That Would Create Invalid Rosters To Go Through? Yes

When A Trade Causes An Invalid Roster, Allow Owner To Submit Lineup? No

8.Trades offered on the web site are valid until revoked or rejected. 9.Trades must be executed on the web site to be official. 10. Trades will be posted and subject to review and a vote. Six votes to reject the trade will kill the deal.

Note; regarding trade votes. As soon as we have our first accepted trade I will find out if the poll will post automatically or if a commish will have to post it themselves. Since trades aren't final until being subject to a league-wide vote for two days, I would advise notifying the commissioner asap of any trades that are accepted. The sooner he knows, the sooner we can get the poll up the sooner we can get the players on the correct roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, the "trade" of kickers between Dead Rabbits and Available was actually an agreed upon switch that happened during the jr draft. The voting period for that is waived as the commissioner agreed to swap those players to avoid reverting draft picks at end of draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't help but notice that 5 people have voted against the trade between Silas and myself. (poll is on front page of site)

It only takes 6 to put the kabosh on the trade so I'm curious what the reasons are? I thought it was a pretty fair deal <shrugs>? Who do you think is getting the better end of the deal? It won't bother me if it doesn't go through but a "no" vote is a powerful tool that should not be used lightly. It is a public vote and you should be able to defend your no vote to the two guys who spent their time working out the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PntherPryd LandSharks gave up:

Jones, Julius SEA RB

Washington, Nate TEN WR

Silas gave up:

Sproles, Darren SDC RB

White, Roddy ATL WR

Look at where they were drafted...and that's the weight people put on players.

Your players were drafted 11th round and 16th round....you're trying to get a 10th round pick who just had Edge added to the rotation and a 2nd round pick out of it. Nate is even banged up a little with a hamstring thing and they face off against Pitt to start. I just didn't see it as being all that balanced of a trade. That's my defense of my no vote.

Make the Roddy swapout w/ Clinton Portis or Willie Parker...and it's more balanced. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PntherPryd LandSharks gave up:

Jones, Julius SEA RB

Washington, Nate TEN WR

Silas gave up:

Sproles, Darren SDC RB

White, Roddy ATL WR

Look at where they were drafted...and that's the weight people put on players.

Your players were drafted 11th round and 16th round....you're trying to get a 10th round pick who just had Edge added to the rotation and a 2nd round pick out of it. Nate is even banged up a little with a hamstring thing and they face off against Pitt to start. I just didn't see it as being all that balanced of a trade. That's my defense of my no vote.

Make the Roddy swapout w/ Clinton Portis or Willie Parker...and it's more balanced. JMO

yeah, you're right. but Julius is still the starter in an offense that is going to run more and Nate being banged up caused him to drop so low, he'll be back in week 2 or 3 and be a big part of that offense. White holding out could cut back on his production and increase the looks to Jenkins. I loaded up on starting running backs to give me some ammo in trades so I'll go back to the drawing board.

Like I said, I'm fine with the trade not going through and at least we know the system of checks/balances works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see that trade up, what gives?

it was on the front page but just got the 6th no vote so I rejected it in the commissioner panel so maybe it is gone.

if not check out what features you have set to appear on your home screen and make sure it allows "new league polls".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the site did not take my rejection of the trade and when I deleted the poll somehow it pushed the trade through. but i just went back in and moved the players back where they are supposed to be.

I'll try it again with Clinton Portis instead of Jones and see if it will fly with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So how about the Mondays after we lose? Because those Mondays after the Jags, Pats, and Bills games better have been run suicides until your legs fall off...
    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
×
×
  • Create New...