Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers first team in NFL history to win a game after trailing in OT


the butch

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Apparently there was one other game with 3 scores in overtime:  JAX v HOU in 2012.  Don't know the details.  See the discussion following the original tweet for more.

There may have been 3 scores but that doesn't mean that the team who was trailing first ended up winning. Could've been JAX kicked a FG first then Houston tied it then JAX won with another FG.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Apparently there was one other game with 3 scores in overtime:  JAX v HOU in 2012.  Don't know the details.  See the discussion following the original tweet for more.

Houston scored first and third, so our stat might stand.

Hou FG

Jax FG

Hou TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Cam El said:

Regular season? Surely it's happened in the playoffs. 

Just looked. Rules changed from sudden death in 2011. Only a few games (about 3) have gone to OT since then, and it looks like there hasn't been a situation where both teams scored in the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CoastalCat said:

Just looked. Rules changed from sudden death in 2011. Only a few games (about 3) have gone to OT since then, and it looks like there hasn't been a situation where both teams scored in the playoffs. 

Wow.  So,  we won in a way,  no team ever has before.  They really do just Keep Pounding! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoastalCat said:

Just looked. Rules changed from sudden death in 2011. Only a few games (about 3) have gone to OT since then, and it looks like there hasn't been a situation where both teams scored in the playoffs. 

Ha, well I can guarantee you there have been more than 3 OT games since 2011.  But it isn't an easy stat to check.

Grab all OT games since the rule change and match the final score with the 4th qtr score.  If the losing team has 3 more than their 4th qtr score then see if they received the ball first.  If the eventual winner has 2 scoring possessions then it was a comeback win, if not then scratch it.  Check them all and if no game matches said criteria then the Panthers were the first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sapper said:

Ha, well I can guarantee you there have been more than 3 OT games since 2011.  But it isn't an easy stat to check.

Grab all OT games since the rule change and match the final score with the 4th qtr score.  If the losing team has 3 more than their 4th qtr score then see if they received the ball first.  If the eventual winner has 2 scoring possessions then it was a comeback win, if not then scratch it.  Check them all and if no game matches said criteria then the Panthers were the first.

Wait what? So, you're tied going into overtime. If you get the ball first and don't score, the other team didn't come back. You can just look at the box score. If only one team scored in overtime, then no team came from behind in overtime. 

OT's in playoffs since 2011:

2011: 

Steelers-Broncoes - Broncos scored 6 in OT

NYG-SF - Giants scored 3 in OT

 

2012: 

Ravens-Broncos - Ravens scored 3 in 2OT

 

2013: N/A

2014:

GB-SEA - SEA scored 6 in OT

 

Sorry, I guessed 3 games, but there have been 4. In zero games did both teams score in OT.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoastalCat said:

Wait what? So, you're tied going into overtime. If you get the ball first and don't score, the other team didn't come back. You can just look at the box score. If only one team scored in overtime, then no team came from behind in overtime. 

OT's in playoffs since 2011:

2011: 

Steelers-Broncoes - Broncos scored 6 in OT

NYG-SF - Giants scored 3 in OT

 

2012: 

Ravens-Broncos - Ravens scored 3 in 2OT

 

2013: N/A

2014:

GB-SEA - SEA scored 6 in OT

 

Sorry, I guessed 3 games, but there have been 4. In zero games did both teams score in OT.

 

Ohhhh you were talking playoffs - I meant reg season and playoffs.

For a team to come from behind in an OT game though, you'd have to look at more than the box score though, since you'd have to establish that the losing team scored in OT and they were the first to score - so you'd need to see the box score of +3 in OT, plus the initial possession :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sapper said:

Ohhhh you were talking playoffs - I meant reg season and playoffs.

For a team to come from behind in an OT game though, you'd have to look at more than the box score though, since you'd have to establish that the losing team scored in OT and they were the first to score - so you'd need to see the box score of +3 in OT, plus the initial possession :)

True, but if you just go through box scores, and every game has one team with a "0" in their OT box (which is the case here), you can stop looking. 

I'm saying that there hasn't been a situation where both teams scored...at all, let alone both scored with the second scorer winning...until last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoastalCat said:

True, but if you just go through box scores, and every game has one team with a "0" in their OT box (which is the case here), you can stop looking. 

Yea, those can be scratched immediately when trying to figure out if other comebacks had happened before the game last night.  It looks like that Houston game was the closest, but once you look at the scoring table:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/playbyplay?gameId=321118034

Hou never trailed.

 

EDIt:  which you can get from the box in this incident too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sapper said:

Yea, those can be scratched immediately when trying to figure out if other comebacks had happened before the game last night.  It looks like that Houston game was the closest, but once you look at the scoring table:

http://espn.go.com/nfl/playbyplay?gameId=321118034

Hou never trailed.

 

EDIt:  which you can get from the box in this incident too.

Yeah. I did have to look at scoring plays once i saw that Jax scored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...