Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Raiders stuck in Oakland mean MLB to NC?


ctrcat

Recommended Posts

I know the only thing that really matters is beating ass this Sunday and beyond, but the fact that the Raiders will have nowhere to go and nowhere to hide will in all likelihood mean they're staying in Oakland long term.  And as unlikely as building one California stadium would be, I couldn't imagine Oakland building a football AND baseball stadium.

So, where would the A's go?  MLB commissioner Rob Manfred mentioned Charlotte as a possibility last year and Knights Stadium opponent Jerry Reese has turned his attention to Raleigh.

Perhaps that was "one" of the reasons JR wanted the Raiders to move, as owners don't like additional competition in their home markets from other sports.

The Carolinas should inevitably be a MLB market eventually, and perhaps yesterday's news expedites that possibility.

Carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Spaceballs83 said:

I don't see the Carolinas being a MLB market. Hard to imagine nc supporting 4 pro teams.

The Carolina's have a rich history with baseball.   Be it  the good ole Carolina Leagues  ( see movie Bull Durham)  or the beginnings of Babe Ruth's Career to where he allegedly got the name "Babe" http://www.visitfayettevillenc.com/baberuth/history

Even the term "Bull Pen" has NC ties

 

 

also see this web page: http://www.chrisholaday.com/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I read somewhere that the A's just signed a 10 year lease for O.co Coliseum. I highly doubt they move any time soon.

That said, I do think the Carolinas could support a pro baseball team. I know more people that arent baseball fans because there is no local pro team, than I know that are fans of any given team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think baseball would thrive here. Baseball is a dying game for old men. I have no idea how it remains profitable. The TV deals are massive and the ratings are horrible. The stadiums are empty for the vast majority of games. Young people in NC as a whole are less likely to support a Baseball team. Older men already have allegiances to the Braves or their transplant market. 

I would not support any municipal funds or tax exemptions to get a Baseball team in Charlotte. Raleigh might do well with a team to be honest. The Bobcats were a hard sell to fans. The Hornets are doing better but unless they win consistently it will never come close to the mid 90s fanbase. 

The thing about Baseball is very few franchises find success without spending money. Half the teams are out of the playoffs before the first pitch is thrown. I don't think there is a market for below average sports franchises in this town. The Panthers, Bobcats, and Hornets have all seen a massive decline in interest when they aren't contending. 

 

MLS might be more appealing. It would require less money from the City and cater to different demographics. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If MLB was actually looking at expansion, they'd probably try to bring back the Expos before looking at the Carolinas.

And as far as relocation is concerned, the Rays and their lease with that airplane hangar in St. Petersburg are probably the next option  (assuming the A's get sorted out.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Like UpstatePanther said,  the Athletics signed a 10 year lease.  Moreover,  the NFL is apparently going to help the Raiders build a new stadium in Oakland (or at least that is the feeling). 

Exactly, but that, apparently, still makes the A's situation "hazy" http://www.csnbayarea.com/athletics/future-still-hazy-after-raiders-denied-la-relocation

And they can get out of the lease so it doesn't sound like it means much if they can still leave after December 2017, as long as the rest of the lease is paid for http://mweb.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-baseball/24633746/as-owner-accepts-changes-10-year-lease-to-remain-in-oco-coliseum-settled

$20 million over 10 years is NOTHING 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ctrcat said:

Exactly, but that, apparently, still makes the A's situation "hazy" http://www.csnbayarea.com/athletics/future-still-hazy-after-raiders-denied-la-relocation

And they can get out of the lease so it doesn't sound like it means much if they can still leave after December 2017, as long as the rest of the lease is paid for http://mweb.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-baseball/24633746/as-owner-accepts-changes-10-year-lease-to-remain-in-oco-coliseum-settled

$20 million over 10 years is NOTHING 

I concede that that is a little interesting,  indeed,  but it sounds like all the parties involved want the As to stay in Oakland. I will be surprised if they don't get a deal done to that end. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw,  I would love to have MLB here in the Carolinas,  I just think that it's still a long way off.  And I don't believe that the powers that be here have enough of a will or machine to put something in play for a team like the As,  nor do I think that MLB is without a sizeable amount of skepticism as it pertains the viability of a team around these parts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Btw,  I would love to have MLB here in the Carolinas,  I just think that it's still a long way off.  And I don't believe that the powers that be here have enough of a will or machine to put something in play for a team like the As,  nor do I think that MLB is without a sizeable amount of skepticism as it pertains the viability of a team around these parts. 

The fact that the word Charlotte specifically came out of Rob Manfred's mouth says something-I don't know what, but something.

You are right that the political climate, specific politicians, ownership, and luck (or lack thereof depending on what side you're on), all must line up, but the A's and Rays can't go on with their stadium situations forever.

And, despite baseball's "dying" reputation, watching so many MLB cities themselves decay truthfully will (if it didn't already with the Knights Stadium) change Charlotte's reason for not having MLB from "can't", to "don't want to".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...