NFL Turning Point: The Clete Blakeman Effect

[GetRealPlease]

Here is the link to all 5 with descriptions:

<a href="http://s1030.photobucket.com/user/attrition407/media/image_zpsqxiri2na.png.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1030.photobucket.com/albums/y366/attrition407/image_zpsqxiri2na.png" border="0" alt="Field Goal 1 photo image_zpsqxiri2na.png"/></a>

[GetRealPlease]

Fixed link:

http://s1030.photobucket.com/user/attrition407/media/image_zpsqxiri2na.png.html?sort=4&o=0

[Thanatos]

8 hours ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Yeah!!

The refs only missed the offsides on our missed field goal, missed the helmet to helmet hit on Cam on the first strip sack, ignored the fact that Von Miller batted the ball on the 2nd strip sack, picked up a defensive holding penalty on the Broncos, and ruled a catch incomplete, despite having video evidence that it was a completion. 

I mean you guys can't really expect them to be perfect! They only screwed up every crucial part of the game. 

TECHNICALLY they were penalties, but who really calls penalties anymore? 

There was no helmet to helmet hit, lol.

Illegal bat being called in a scrum NEVER has happened. Not a single time. The ref cannot know if he is going for the ball or not.

I already posted the evidence that the catch was not a catch. The ball clearly hits the ground.

Let it go, man.

[Zaximus]

There are too many blown calls and too many one-sided calls to ever think it's just a coincidence.  One call, sure, two, ok, three, four, five, six, seven..... when is it acceptable to start thinking things are one-sided?  Close to 20 obviously isn't enough.  30?  Every play?   It's funny that people have been convicted of murder with less evidence than the bad calls showing favoritism by the refs.   I really wish I thought the world was all rainbows and unicorns as well.   And yeah, people are NOT going to just let it go, you could though, by not replying anymore lol.

[Thanatos]

2 hours ago, Kuechly59 said:

What is or isn't is irrelevant.... We lost but it doesn't change the fact the NFL needs to be more consistent in the enforcement of the rules... My biggest complaint is the no call on roby when he mugged Ginn only to come back and call a must less aggregeous hold on Norman. 

I agree with that.

The game was over after Newton failed to recover that fumble, though, unless McManus misses a chip-shot FG attempt, as a 19-10 lead is still two scores.

But yes, that was an awful holding call, given that they had just been letting them play all game long and then with 4 minutes left in the 4th quarter, decided to call holding.

Which reminds me: Rivera punting the ball on 4th and 24 from the 6 with 3 minutes to go was absolutely and completely spineless.

[Thanatos]

2 hours ago, Kuechly59 said:

My point is if your gonna call that on Norman you have to call that on Roby, it's a first and goal on a drive we moved the ball well.... With that proper call at the very least Gano makes the fg it's a completely different game...

Again, I agree. They weren't consistent with DPI calls.

Roby definitely committed DPI, but I was okay with the non-call, (not in the heat of the moment, but looking back), if they had been consistent the rest of the game. But they weren't.

Edit: Although those were two different drives. The drive where Gano misses the FG is where they picked up the holding call. I'm talking about the drive where Roby had Ginn wrapped up on 3rd down at around the 15 yard line. It potentially cost us 4 points, but Gano hit the FG on that drive.

Edit 2: There's two things the NFL needs to really look at as far as the officiating goes. DPI and what is a catch. Those two things were very much inconsistent over the course of the year and it colored my enjoyment of things because of how many calls were made I considered to be the wrong call.

[GetRealPlease]

Just for the record, there were no DPI calls in the entire game, on either team.  You can argue they should have called holding on Denver, but you can't really argue that they shouldn't have called it on Norman, because he turned Thomas' body on the route more than 5 yards off the LOS.  Besides, that hold did nothing to the game outcome.  It just would have been 19-10 instead of 24-10.

[GetRealPlease]

1 minute ago, Kuechly59 said:

That's not the argument.... How can you allow Roby to tackle Ginn before the ball gets there?

 

But still call holding on Norman stfu and go back to your board.

1.  He didn't.

2. Stop making up excuses for why the Panthers lost and accept they got outplayed and outcoached.  "STFU go away" is a terrible argument.

[Raskle]

Why are you guys still arguing with these Broncos fans? It's like trying to convince the internet equivalent of a five-year-old sticking fingers in both ears and screaming "LALALALALALA-I'M NOT LISTENING!"

 

It's fruitless and futile. Let it go. You won't convince this person of a different view than he/she/it can convince you of a differing one either. So, what's the point?

[GetRealPlease]

3 minutes ago, Kuechly59 said:

1. He did it was blantant

2. You are a pathetic sub human sack of poo who trolls anther teams board weeks after the game.... Now please shut up and kill you self!

1. It was neither blantant nor blatant. 

2. You're telling me to kill myself over sharing facts about a football game.  Which of us is more degenerate I wonder?

[GetRealPlease]

10 minutes ago, Kuechly59 said:

Your opinion is like a smelly asshole here on a panthers board you will have no support.

And that's nothing if I saw you in person I'd break your knee caps and piss on your face  shut up and go die in a hole troll.

I already showed pictures for one of my "opinions", and I can get more for others if you really want.  I've already gotten support from some people here, the ones who aren't terrified of facts.

I'm pretty skeptical about what you think you would do to me in person, because most people who puff themselves up like that in an anonymous environment crap themselves and hide in an actual confrontation.  Whatever, it's not really relevant because we're never going to meet, so thanks for sharing, I guess.

By the way, I haven't trolled anyone here about the loss, and I'm not going to start trolling you, despite your provocation.  The Panthers had a great season and should be proud of it.  I think it's unfortunate that some of you can't accept the facts of the game and have to make up a ref fixing, NFL conspiracy to try to cope.  The Panthers had 2 opportunities to score a TD and win the game when it was 16-10, and they couldn't stop the Denver pass rush.  None of the officials sacked Cam over and over again, and none of the officials dropped pass after pass.  The game was decided by the players, whether you can accept it or not.

[GetRealPlease]

5 minutes ago, Kuechly59 said:

Whatever validation you seek for your official assisted and NFL sanctioned win you will not get it here.

Whenever you grow up and someone has taught you more about football and when you're ready to have adult conversations, let me know and we can discuss the game.  Until that day though, tell your English teacher that you need help learning how to frame an argument and present a counterpoint to an opinion with which you disagree.  As it stands, you're pretty bad at it.

[rayzor]

ok....moving on. this thread has run it's course. panthers got robbed and ol' clete was the robber. end of story.