Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

purchasing a video camera and A/V equipment


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

I need to buy a video camera. I've got some professional duties that will require it and personal interest in shooting some stuff as well, and the time has come to start looking around.

Specifically, I need a production quality camera that's capable of shooting big screen material. I would also like a second camera that's more portable and conducive to spontaneity.

Any thoughts on brands, models, features, stores, etc.?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on your budget.  If you want the "big screen material" look on a budget without purchasing a RED I would recommend a used Canon 5D Mark 2. You can probably get one for around $2000. It has a full frame sensor which gives that film look. I've always shot on DSLRs for video because of their versatility.  What kind of filming will this be? Interviews? Promotional? Documentary? Short Film? What other A/V equipment are you looking at? My go to store is Adorama and B&H. They know their poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dex said:

It really depends on your budget.  If you want the "big screen material" look on a budget without purchasing a RED I would recommend a used Canon 5D Mark 2. You can probably get one for around $2000. It has a full frame sensor which gives that film look. I've always shot on DSLRs for video because of their versatility.  What kind of filming will this be? Interviews? Promotional? Documentary? Short Film? What other A/V equipment are you looking at? My go to store is Adorama and B&H. They know their poo.

i've been looking at the 5D and a few comparable models by sony (NX100). my budget is between 1500-3000, though i'd rather keep it around 2k if possible. i actually don't care about shooting in 4k all that much either, which should be able to save me some coin.

i'm actually doing two types of filming. i will be doing some shorter travel doc type of things that will demand the versatility of a dslr (i'll just use the one i have now.) but i also would like to produce some feature-length stuff, more as personal interest projects than anything. lots of exterior shooting. i would like some versatility in shooting so besides the general tripod i'll also eventually invest in a nice boom and a dolly system as well.

do you have opinions on XLR functions? is it worth the trouble hooking up extra equipment? will the audio be that much better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

i've been looking at the 5D and a few comparable models by sony (NX100). my budget is between 1500-3000, though i'd rather keep it around 2k if possible. i actually don't care about shooting in 4k all that much either, which should be able to save me some coin.

i'm actually doing two types of filming. i will be doing some shorter travel doc type of things that will demand the versatility of a dslr (i'll just use the one i have now.) but i also would like to produce some feature-length stuff, more as personal interest projects than anything. lots of exterior shooting. i would like some versatility in shooting so besides the general tripod i'll also eventually invest in a nice boom and a dolly system as well.

do you have opinions on XLR functions? is it worth the trouble hooking up extra equipment? will the audio be that much better?

If you're going to be on the move alot and don't want to lug around a dolly I would look into glidecams. I own the HD2000 I think it was $400 and I get incredible shots with it. Go to youtube and checkout "devinsupertramp glidecam" videos.

 

As for audio again it depends on the shooting you're doing. You can attach a Rode Shotgun mic to your camera or shell out for a Zoom H4n or Tascam recorder. These are handy for crisp recording and if you're using Lav mics. If you're going to be outside I would recommend a boom shotgunic with a dead cat to cut out wind. Probably your best bet on a budget. I prefer using XLR microphones with phantom power at home. However you can get away with alternatives on the road as long as you have a good recorder. You will notice a difference.  On camera audio is garbage without an external mic.

 

Now I don't know which lenses you have for your DSLR but i would recommend a prime 50mm 1.4. I use this for close up shots and it looks gorgeous. If you don't have a frame DSLR you're going to want a lens that let's plenty of light in. I would look into used L series lenses. (Canon guy). Let me know If you have any questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good stuff! i am still immersing myself into all this, so many of my questions will come after i make a purchase and actually start producing a few test films. at this juncture i just need to make sure i'm buying something with the capacity to look crystal clear on a big screen and to have professional-quality audio (in my experience this is where inexperienced/microbudget filmmakers tend to fail. nothing turns me off like garbage audio from the outset.)

editing and post production is ground i won't touch for a while, but what software do you use? everyone keeps telling me to go with premier.

also do you just order your gear online or do you go purchase it in a brick and mortar store somewhere? i have to say the idea of dropping 3k on a camera that's going to get shipped to my front door where some clown could steal it makes me a little nervous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

good stuff! i am still immersing myself into all this, so many of my questions will come after i make a purchase and actually start producing a few test films. at this juncture i just need to make sure i'm buying something with the capacity to look crystal clear on a big screen and to have professional-quality audio (in my experience this is where inexperienced/microbudget filmmakers tend to fail. nothing turns me off like garbage audio from the outset.)

editing and post production is ground i won't touch for a while, but what software do you use? everyone keeps telling me to go with premier.

also do you just order your gear online or do you go purchase it in a brick and mortar store somewhere? i have to say the idea of dropping 3k on a camera that's going to get shipped to my front door where some clown could steal it makes me a little nervous.

Yes, bad audio could sink a film faster than an iceberg in the Atlantic. I would take the audio just as serious as you take the video. You will learn some tricks down the road to cut out "noise"in post pro and make the audio send better via compression and stuff. Youtube is your friend.

 

 

 

 

I use Final Cut Pro X but you can't go wrong with Premiere. I actually own both FCPX and the Adobe creative package that's $30 a month and you get all of the Adobe programs (photoshop, premiere, aftereffects, audition etc.) FCPX is Mac exclusive but it's very smooth and there is much less of a learning curve than Premerie. However it's much easier to work on a project when you can use the Adobe Bridge to seamlessly bring your projects in and out of Adobe software. I would watch some Youtube videos and see what you like best. If you just want a clean user interface and own a Mac I say go with FCPX. If you plan on doing special effects and want the extra software go with the Adobe Creative package.

 

I order my gear online but I drove to NYC to pickup my camera haha. That's a lot of money and I wouldn't want to take the chance.

 

The below video would be a good starter package for you. Canon 5D Mark II, Zoom H4N and an 85mm lens. Prob looking at around $3000 total for the 3. But you can search for used items and bargains. Great combo to start with though.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On February 27, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Dex said:

Yes, bad audio could sink a film faster than an iceberg in the Atlantic. I would take the audio just as serious as you take the video. You will learn some tricks down the road to cut out "noise"in post pro and make the audio send better via compression and stuff. Youtube is your friend.

you are the absolute man. thanks for all the info. any chance if i posted a couple of models i'm looking at you could toss a few brief opinions about them? pros/cons what you think they'd be best for shooting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

you are the absolute man. thanks for all the info. any chance if i posted a couple of models i'm looking at you could toss a few brief opinions about them? pros/cons what you think they'd be best for shooting?

Of course!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

@Dex, what do you think of the sony FDR-AX100?

 

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1022653-REG/sony_fdrax100_b_hdr_ax100_full_hd_handycam.html

 

1389198276000_IMG_360504.jpg

 

My qualifications are simply that it has to put up a good enough picture to give me a production-quality big screen finish, be versatile enough to let me run a separate audio input, and give me reasonably good results shooting outdoors (wind could be a factor, so stability is good.)

Does this pass the eye test to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...