Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

US Open


stirs

Recommended Posts

The USGA showed its ass yesterday on the Johnson ruling and everything that went with it.

The second the ball moved Johnson stepped away and called the ref over. The ref asked if he grounded his club behind or otherwise addressed the ball. Johnson said, "No." That should have been the end of the story. Golf is promoted to be a game of integrity where players call penalties on themselves. In this case, waiting 6 holes before someone decides they are more important than the players on TV decides to tell Johnson, "We're going to review this after the round."

Glad he won by 4 shots, or 3 or whatever the USGA decided....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone wants to talk about Johnson's balls moving...  I am just pissed off they gave him two club links that let him actually place his ball in the shorter grass...  Such a BS abuse of the rules....  He was a hundred yards away from the "obstruction" and he still had to hit right over it !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dave-o said:

Everyone wants to talk about Johnson's balls moving...  I am just pissed off they gave him two club links that let him actually place his ball in the shorter grass...  Such a BS abuse of the rules....  He was a hundred yards away from the "obstruction" and he still had to hit right over it !!

It's a line of sight issue, not necessarily an obstruction in the sense it effects the direct path or flight of the ball. He could not see the flag from where he took his stance due to a man-made and placed object. His ball could have landed in the middle of that fairway and been on a perfect lie and he still would have gotten relief if he couldn't see the flag. Doesn't matter where the ball is, if your line of sight, swing or ball flight is obstructed because of a man-made, temporary immovable object, you get relief. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, dave-o said:

Doesnt make me like the rule....  He suffered nothing for a shitty tee shot....

Anybodyhome is correct... the rules of golf are often overly penal so I don't mind when players use them to their advantage.

I don't think DJ caused the ball to move, so I think they were incorrect, but it's made glaringly bad by the fact that they didn't issue the ruling immediately instead of waiting until after play was concluded, that made ZERO sense and is bad for the game.  They are lucky that he pulled away so far that their stupidity didn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...