Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Practice Squad eligibility rule changes - more exemptions for experienced players


KB_fan

Recommended Posts

Too funny... only an hour or so ago I wondered aloud on another thread about whether there had been any news on new practice squad rules.... and lo and behold, this evening comes this tweet:

So the 10 person PS has been approved for another years, and 2 more players can have 2 accrued seasons.

GREAT NEWS for the Panthers given that we work hard at developing young players over a few seasons.  I'm thinking this could have implications for players like Bersin, Foucault...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More info:

http://www.stampedeblue.com/2016/6/17/11966110/nfl-nflpa-agree-to-expand-practice-squad-rules

 

Quote

 

The NFL and the NFLPA have reached an agreement to continue the expanded practice squad rule that passed in 2014.

For the past two seasons, each team’s practice squad has been expanded to ten players from the eight player practice squads the league previously had. It was a little-known fact this offseason that the deal had expired, but the two sides have reached an agreement to continue moving forward.

In addition to the ten-man practice squad, the league also expanded the number of ‘veteran’ practice squad players allowed. In the past two seasons, two players with two years of accrued service were still eligible for the practice squad, and that number has been expanded to four players moving forward. What this means is that there will be more chances for players with a little bit of playing time (two accrued seasons or less) to stick around with an NFL team on their practice squad.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Too funny... only an hour or so ago I wondered aloud on another thread about whether there had been any news on new practice squad rules.... and lo and behold, this evening comes this tweet:

So the 10 person PS has been approved for another years, and 2 more players can have 2 accrued seasons.

GREAT NEWS for the Panthers given that we work hard at developing young players over a few seasons.  I'm thinking this could have implications for players like Bersin, Foucault...

 

Hill & Garrett 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Garrett always would have been eligible since he's a rookie.  The limit is still 10 players, as it's been the past 2 seasons.  The change is that we can now keep around some guys who've had some playing time or previous seasons on the PS.

Players like Bersin, Yankey, Laron Byrd, Norwood, Foucault  I think now would all be able to be stashed on the PS.   Doesn't mean they'll be safe from being poached, but it expands our options with some of these guys.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/06/2016 at 7:36 AM, KB_fan said:

Players like Bersin, Yankey, Laron Byrd, Norwood, Foucault  I think now would all be able to be stashed on the PS.   Doesn't mean they'll be safe from being poached, but it expands our options with some of these guys.  

So my Great Aussie Hope has a bit more of a chance! This is good news KB_fan, good news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norwood. Foucault. Lucas?

Garrett worries me if he goes to PS but I guess by that time, if he hasn't earned a spot, he hasn't earned a spot.

Wegher is gone if he goes PS.

I wonder if these rules would encourage any new signings of guys that got cast off before. Ex: Someone like Lester should still be eligible right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...