Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Strength of Schedule based on SB odds


Recommended Posts

Saw a very interesting post that referenced teams strength of schedule based on their opponents superbowl odds. Instead of calculating strength of schedule based on a teams 2015 record, this site calculated SOS based on current vegas odds, assigning the teams a number 1-32 and averaging the total for each team.  While not a perfect measure, it was interesting how this stacked up:   With 1 being the toughest SOS. http://nfltraderumors.co/2016-nfl-strength-schedule/

Rank

Team

Avg. Opp. SB Odds

SB Odds

1. Redskins 12.25 4000
2. Eagles 12.69 5000
3. Browns 13.69 10000
4. Jets 14.06 5000
4. Ravens 14.06 3300
6. 49ers 14.31 10000
6. Vikings 14.31 2000
8. Texans 14.44 3300
9. Bills 14.50 5000
10. Bengals 14.63 1800
11. Buccaneers 14.75 10000
11. Lions 14.75 6600
13. Steelers 15.13 1,000
14. Dolphins 15.25 6600
15. Giants 15.31 2500
16. Rams 15.56 6600
16. Titans 15.56 7500
18. Jaguars 15.63 5000
18. Broncos 15.63 1800
18. Packers 15.63 1000
21. Colts 15.75 2500
22. Falcons 15.88 5000
23. Chiefs 15.94 2500
24. Saints 16.00 6600
25. Patriots 16.19 700
26. Bears 16.25 5000
27. Cowboys 16.31 2000
28. Chargers 16.38 6600
29. Raiders 16.69 2500
30. Cardinals 17.25 1200
31. Seahawks 17.44 800
32. Panthers 17.81 1100
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...