Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scouting The Vikings


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, greghardy'sAK-47 said:

Wonder if Bradford remembers the last time he came to Carolina?  We really fuged him up.  

Anyway, Vikings look solid on D.  Their O-line can't block for poo though.  I like our chances at home against one dimensional offenses led by Sam Bradford.  

I would feel better with AP back there. I don't trust Bradford despite his good game. It's only one game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Vikesfan said:

That's very likely. Our Oline is a major problem. Our Qbs get touched and touched too often. Our CB play is solid. Not great not bad. Solid. Rhodes can be a great cb one game and then give up several catches the next. The key is our Dline. If they can close the deal with their rushes, we have a decent chance. Be aware that we have been looking like a turnover machine on defense this season. 4 fumbles and an Int last game. a pick 6 and fumble for a td the game prior. 

We are extremely familiar with Captain around here.  And IMO the only person he can check on our offense is Philly Brown.  That's interesting about your turnovers.  Sounds A LOT like us; we dominated takeaways last year by a large margin.  It appears y'all are enjoying early success in that regard this year.  The Panthers have picked up right where we left off from last year.  So it will be interesting to see who can protect the ball:  MVP, Cam Newton, or the new prince, Sam Bradford?  My bets on Cam there for a laundry list of reasons.  

As for your rushes, it COULD work.  Our OC, Dammit Shula, doesn't know how to shift to neutral at the light and call dink and dunk plays to break pressure.  But that's only if you can get consistent pressure.  Our OL is up to the task [see Denver], but lacks consistency.  I just don't think this is a defined difference-maker anyway, but it's something to keep an eye on, for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Vikesfan said:

I would feel better with AP back there. I don't trust Bradford despite his good game. It's only one game. 

Yea, of course.  AP is sick, but they still weren't blocking for him either.  And you're right, the problem with Bradford, beyond injury of course, is his consistency.  If you guys can't run the ball it could get ugly.  Really depends on if the Panther offense has gotten the TOs out of their system though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dick the Butcher said:

We are extremely familiar with Captain around here.  And IMO the only person he can check on our offense is Philly Brown.  That's interesting about your turnovers.  Sounds A LOT like us; we dominated takeaways last year by a large margin.  It appears y'all are enjoying early success in that regard this year.  The Panthers have picked up right where we left off from last year.  So it will be interesting to see who can protect the ball:  MVP, Cam Newton, or the new prince, Sam Bradford?  My bets on Cam there for a laundry list of reasons.  

As for your rushes, it COULD work.  Our OC, Dammit Shula, doesn't know how to shift to neutral at the light and call dink and dunk plays to break pressure.  But that's only if you can get consistent pressure.  Our OL is up to the task [see Denver], but lacks consistency.  I just don't think this is a defined difference-maker anyway, but it's something to keep an eye on, for sure.

It all depends on if Rhodes plays. 
I can see them putting him on KB like we did Calvin Johnson. Use LB help underneath him and put old man Newman on Ginn. You guys have size for a clear mismatch and worst of all, play on jump balls seem to be a problem for us. 

My vikes are prone to one or two games that get out of hand every season (Seattle and Green Bay last season). However, I am hoping that we play mistake free ball this week and shock the world. Right now I give it 60/40 Panthers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, greghardy'sAK-47 said:

Yea, of course.  AP is sick, but they still weren't blocking for him either.  And you're right, the problem with Bradford, beyond injury of course, is his consistency.  If you guys can't run the ball it could get ugly.  Really depends on if the Panther offense has gotten the TOs out of their system though.  

Yes but I liken AP to Shaq. The attention he forces in defense has an huge impact even if he is struggling. He opens up the middle of the field and helps his Wrs only have to beat the man on them. With him in the game 9 out of ten plays your face a high safety defense of some sort. Remove him from the lineup and now DCs can play 7 at the line and help on who ever they want. Your defense is now allowed to be more exotic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think some of you guys are giving Vikesfan too hard of a time...  he's on here talking in enemy territory about his team with good football analysis and no attitude... chill tf out.

 

Good analysis @Vikesfan...  I think MN will be a pretty tough game with or without AP.  Panthers needs to stop with the silly mistakes, we got away with way too many Sunday.

 

I would expound on our OL a little, but I'm not really the one to do it.   One question I have myself is how is Trai Turner?  I know he was out some vs the 49ers and Daryl Williams played RG for at least a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Darth Biscuit said:

One question I have myself is how is Trai Turner?  I know he was out some vs the 49ers and Daryl Williams played RG for at least a bit.

He was back in a few plays later, and played the remainder of the game, so it shouldn't be anything to worry about too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shotgun said:

 

2 hours ago, Darth Biscuit said:

I personally think some of you guys are giving Vikesfan too hard of a time...  he's on here talking in enemy territory about his team with good football analysis and no attitude... chill tf out.

 

Good analysis @Vikesfan...  I think MN will be a pretty tough game with or without AP.  Panthers needs to stop with the silly mistakes, we got away with way too many Sunday.

 

I would expound on our OL a little, but I'm not really the one to do it.   One question I have myself is how is Trai Turner?  I know he was out some vs the 49ers and Daryl Williams played RG for at least a bit.

Thanks @Darth Biscuit. I'm not trying to be a jerk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...