Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

myles garett


juliosantos

Recommended Posts

At this point, our draft pick will probably be between 12 and 20, so posting top 5 guys might be fun, but not realistic.

Now, if Cam goes on IR or some other crippling things, then Garrett might enter the conversation.

The Tennessee DE might be more in our range "at this point"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, The Lone Panther said:

The only way we're getting Garrett is by tanking.  So the big question is, do we tank this season to draft Garrett? 

that might be their plan . They aren't making moves  to save our season so it looks like we are in tanking mode

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we have to tank. Our defensive secondary will do all the tanking for us. If we didn't beat the Saints or Bucs who the hell do you think we will beat the rest of the season? We are playing against teams like Cardinals, Chargers, Raiders, and play the Saints , Falcons, and Bucs again all of whom we lost to already. I could see is winning against the Bucs and maybe the Rams but that's about it. We face some pretty damn competent offenses with an ultra shitty defense for the rest of the season, which means plenty more Ls . 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...